LeoHohmann.com

News out of Germany today ought to make every Christian and Jew in the West take note: This is your future if you continue to allow your governments to invite migrants and so-called “refugees” into your cities and towns.

New Year’s Eve celebrations in Berlin will offer a “safe zone” for women for the first time in the city’s history.

Organizers of the Brandenburg Gate party are hoping to prevent mob attacks similar to those that occurred in Cologne two years ago, when hundreds of women and girls were mauled, groped and sexually assaulted on New Year’s Eve.

Fox News has the story here, although even Fox refuses to tell the whole story, neglecting to mention the words “Muslim” or “Islam” as the reason for the new air-tight security measures.

Fox chose to refer to the December 2015 attackers merely as “gangs of men with migrant backgrounds.”

Last year’s New Year’s celebrations included thousands of extra police officers on patrol, and while the number of attacks was not as bad as in 2015, there were still many women who were assaulted by Muslim migrants who see Western women as “asking to be raped” because they don’t cover themselves like Islamic women.

So, to take the security to another level, the German capital will this year have a “safety zone” where Red Cross helpers will look after women who feel harassed or threatened.

The revelation of “safe zones” for women trying to celebrate the new year, comes on the heels of reports just weeks ago that the traditional Christmas markets held in almost every city across Germany had to be fortified with armed guards and concrete barriers to ward off would-be Islamic terrorists like the one that killed 12 and injured several dozen in last year’s Berlin truck attack.

The writing is on the wall for those who still have eyes to see. Whether we want to face it or not, it should be obvious what is happening. Since Germany opened its borders to more than 1.5 million Muslim migrants over the past couple of years, life for ordinary Germans will never be the same.

Rape and terrorism are the new normal. What the German government under globalist dhimmi Angela Merkel is saying by these actions is obvious. “Scope out your safe zones’ women of Germany, because outside of that zone our police are unable to protect you from these rapists we have invited into YOUR country.”

They come with a sense of entitlement. Not help themselves only to the generous German welfare system, but the fair-haired German women not fortunate enough to find a ‘safe zone’ are apparently also theirs for the taking!

The lunacy of the left is on full display and if anyone is under the illusion that the left thinks any different in America than it does in Germany, they need to get a copy of my book, Stealth Invasion: Muslim Conquest through Immigration and Resettlement Jihad.

I don’t expect facts, no matter how harsh or how jolting, to change the minds of the hardcore left and its globalist counterparts on the right. They will take a sword for Islam, which they have decided to adopt for what I believe are nefarious reasons, not the least of which is that the globalist left knows Islam will come in handy in their eventual plan to round up, imprison and even kill conservative Christians. These radical leftists and globalists are never going to change because they are blinded by their own hatred of Christianity, which they see as the true root-cause of all the world’s problems.

But I do remain aghast at the numbers of moderate and conservative-leaning Christians who are still bamboozled by the left’s argument that it’s the ethical, humanitarian, even Christian thing to do to import large numbers of Muslim migrants into our country.

One of the greatest deceptions of our time is going on INSIDE the churches. A large part of the infrastructure that works to resettle Muslim migrants into the West is affiliated with the Catholic, Episcopal and Lutheran churches, as well as evangelical churches that donate time and money to once-legitimately humanitarian World Relief Corp.

Under the banner of religion, these once-great institutions have prostituted themselves for the almighty dollar, and they lie to the faithful in order to enrich themselves.

The truth is they get paid by the head, $2,050 for every refugee they resettle in America. When the flow of refugees gets paired back, so do their revenues, and if the influx continues to slow they are forced to lay off workers and cut salaries [which are all above six figures for the upper-level managers].

The biggest lie of all is that by resettling Muslim migrants into Western cities, the Christian is fulfilling his or her biblical duty to show love for the “stranger in the land.” They use quotes from the Bible to bring in men from a culture that teaches them that it’s OK to prey on non-Muslim women and children.

The reality is that if these self-righteous Christians were really filled with the love of God they could not have any part in importing a culture that justifies raping our women, spousal abuse, honor violence, female genital mutilation and terrorism in the name of religious belief.

When a man believes his religion justifies his hurtful actions against another fellow human being, it’s almost impossible to convince him to stop the hurtful activity. Allah blesses it, therefore it must be right.

They might tell us that by bringing these migrants to the West the migrants will be exposed to a different code of ethics and will eventually clean up their act.

Even if they believe that, the left is willing to sacrifice how many innocent lives in what amounts to a social experiment?

Sorry, but when one’s culture is intertwined with one’s religion, why would they change, short of a miraculous conversion? And all of the Catholics, Lutherans and evangelicals working with the government to resettle Muslim refugees into the U.S. have signed contracts with the U.S. State Department agreeing not to proselytize the Muslims, so their actions don’t back up their words. It’s not about winning souls for Christ. It’s about bringing more money into their coffers. Period.

We made a lot of progress in 2017. My prayer is that even more Christians and Jews will be enlightened to this scam in 2018.

Editor’s note: Over the next few days we will be sharing the top stories of 2017 that went under-reported, often completely ignored, by the mainstream media. This one from April has to rank on top of our list. To our knowledge, this “Shariah cop” continues to make house calls in the Cedar Riverside area of Minneapolis, an area otherwise known as “Little Mogadishu,” while the Minneapolis Police Department continues to offer a wink and a nod, tolerating a foreign legal system hiding in plain sight.

By LEO HOHMANN

A 22-year-old Muslim convert has been denounced for trying to enforce Shariah law on Somali refugees living in Minneapolis, but he says he’s just trying to be a good Muslim and please Allah.

Abdullah Rashid married a Somali woman and moved from his hometown in Walton County, Georgia, to Wyoming and then on to Minnesota last year. Formerly Devon James Miller, Rashid now dresses in traditional Islamic headdress. But when he isn’t in a turban, he wears a green uniform with a patch marking him as the “religious police.”

That’s causing quite a stir, even in the Muslim enclave of Minneapolis’s Cedar Riverside community.

In a recent interview with the Minneapolis Star-Tribune, Rashid said he aims to turn the city’s Cedar-Riverside area into a “sharia-controlled zone” where Muslims are learning about the proper practices of Islam and that “non-Muslims are asked to respect” it, the paper reported.

He pays regular visits to Somali households and makes sure the women are dressed in compliance with Islamic law, that no alcohol is being consumed and that nobody is interacting with the opposite sex. He is performing, in his mind, a service similar to that of the morality police who enforce Shariah in Saudi Arabia, Iran, Somalia or the Islamic State.

He claims to have 10 other men working under him to patrol the Cedar Riverside community.

Abdullah Rashid, 22, grew up in Georgia and converted to Islam in his teens. He married a Somali woman and moved to Minneapolis in 2016.

There’s one problem: While Rashid says he is just trying to be a good Muslim and do right by Allah, someone needs to remind him he isn’t living in Saudi Arabia, Iran, or Somalia.

“People who don’t know me would say I’m a terrorist,” he told the local newspaper. “I’m someone who’s dedicated to Islam and trying to help the community all ways I can.”

Local Muslim leaders told the Star-Tribune they are working to stop Rashid’s group, the General Presidency of the Religious Affairs and Welfare of the Ummah, while providing no evidence that they are serious about stopping him.

Minneapolis is home to the nation’s largest community of Somali refugees, which have been arriving in the U.S. since the late 1980s, most coming from United Nations refugee camps.

The Somalis have taken over Democrat Party politics in the sixth ward in Minneapolis, and a recent video showed their caucus event devolving into bloody chaos.

Rashid has encountered some backlash, even from other Muslims who may not yet be ready for full compliance with various aspects of Shariah law, or who know it would do long-term damage to Islam’s reputation in America if Muslims try to implement Shariah too early.

Rashid has been questioned by Minneapolis police who say they are “monitoring” his actions.

He has been condemned as out of line by local Muslim leaders, according to the Minneapolis Star-Tribune, which turned to the Council on American-Islamic Relations, or CAIR, for the authoritative word on Shariah.

“What he’s doing is wrong and doesn’t reflect the community at all,” Jaylani Hussein, executive director of CAIR Minnesota, told the Star-Tribune. CAIR, an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood, is an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation terror-financing trial held in 2007-08 in Dallas and which has seen several of its leaders convicted of terrorism-related crimes.

“We’ve had conversations with community members that live over there,” Officer Corey Schmidt, a police spokesman, told the Star-Tribune. “Sometimes it takes a little bit of time to deal with it, but it’s something we’ve been monitoring.”

There are other troubling aspects to Rashid’s mission, such as his display of the al-Qaida flag and his adoration of Anwar al-Awlaki, the American-born imam of Yemeni descent who was a spiritual leader of al-Qaida before he was killed in Yemen by a drone strike ordered by President Obama.

His Somali wife, Kadro Abdullahi, said Rashid is not mentally ill and that she supports his work.

“He’s a man with a good personality and he loves Islam,” Abdullahi told the Star-Tribune.

On his website, Rashid posted a video by Anwar al-Awlaki titled “Never Trust Non-Muslims.”

On the same day the Star-Tribune reported a Shariah enforcer is making house visits in Minneapolis, the Detroit News reported a female Muslim doctor in Detroit was arrested on federal charges that she was performing female genital mutilations on girls as young as 7.

Dr. Jumana Nagarwala was charged in Detroit Wednesday with mutilating the genitalia of young girls.

Jumana Nagarwala, a 44-year-old emergency-room doctor at Henry Ford Hospital, was charged with female genital mutilation, a five-year felony, and transportation with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity, a 10-year felony, according to a complaint unsealed Thursday in U.S. District Court. It is believed to be the first case of its kind prosecuted under federal law.

The Star-Tribune, which surprised some by even reporting on the Shariah cop in Minneapolis, described Shariah as merely a set of customs that Muslims follow as a “daily guide” and that varies in practice around the world. That is almost word for word the description for Shariah given by the Southern Poverty Law Center, a left-of-center political organization that defends Islam at every turn.

Anwar al-Awlaki published Inspire magazine, the chief recruitment tool for the group al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula.

Inspire ran articles that included recipes for homemade bombs and encouraged Muslim acts of global terrorism.

“Al-Awlaki was as bad as it got in the terrorism world,” noted former Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann.

“So dangerous was al-Awlaki that even President Obama ordered his death through a drone strike, the only American Obama ordered killed on foreign soil.”

Thursday’s revelation in the Star-Tribune is frightening, Bachmann said.

“Today, walking freely on the streets near the former hippie enclaves of the University of Minnesota, near downtown Minneapolis, and in the shadow of light-rail connecting to the Mall of American and the new United Bank football stadium, site of the 2018 Super Bowl, is a Muslim man wearing al-Qaida flags on his green ‘religious police uniform’ who takes his directives from the chief recruiter for Islamic terrorism in modern times.”

Shariah implemented in phases

Attorney Daniel Akbari once practiced law before Iran’s top Shariah court. He now lives in Texas and converted to Christianity.

Akbari said Rashid may be jumping the gun in enforcing Shariah, thus incurring the wrath of imams and CAIR leaders who may see him as usurping their authority.

Akbari said the Quran provides three basic mechanisms for spreading Islam: Dawa or proselytizing, jihad and the enforcement of Shariah. But the Shariah mission is to be implemented in phases in areas where Muslims already have control and want to maintain their authority.

Shariah can be enforced both privately and collectively, he said.

Akbari said “private enforcement of Shariah is exactly what Abdullah Rashid is doing.”

“He assumes Muslims have control over the neighborhood he is patrolling. Abdullah Rashid’s assessment of the situation and his assumption that Muslims have control over those neighborhoods is something that CAIR finds unrealistic,” he said.

“CAIR members strongly disagree with their faithful but naïve Muslim brother, Abdullah Rashid. CAIR is well aware that they have not reached that point yet. They know how rushing to enforce Shariah will irreparably damage their mission of bringing everyone under the control of Shariah law.”

CAIR applied the same analogy against ISIS, Akbari said.

“Leaders of CAIR called ISIS non-Islamic because they believed that their savage brothers did not follow the way the Messenger of Allah did when he was in a weak position,” he said.

“When the Messenger of Allah was in Mecca, he did not wage jihad because he knew he was not in a strong position. It is not that ISIS’ brutal actions are non-Islamic. The only non-Islamic action they committed was revealing the real face of orthodox Islam too early when there are still works to be done.”

Islam is all about Shariah

John Guandolo, a former FBI counter-terrorist specialist who now consults law enforcement with Understanding the Threat, said there are two reasons Muslim organizations clash: over matters of Shariah and matters of power and control.

“What Abdullah Rashid is doing is lawful under Shariah, and CAIR and the other Muslim groups mentioned in the Star-Tribune article know it,” he told WND.

Guandolo said the Star-Tribune is incorrect in asserting that Shariah is “a daily guide” for Muslims.

“Shariah is law that comes with punishments from their god Allah in the Quran and their prophet Muhammad, who is the ‘perfect example’ for all Muslims to follow.”

The Star Tribune’s commentary that Shariah’s “interpretation and practice vary around the world” is also false, Guandolo said.

“While Shariah may be implemented in different stages in different areas, what Shariah is and what it says does not vary. There is one Islam and one Shariah. One-hundred percent of Shariah mandates warfare against non-Muslims until the world is under Shariah, and a ‘Muslim’ is one who submits to the Shariah. Ask the Hamas leaders like Jaylani Hussein of CAIR Minneapolis to produce one authoritative book on Shariah that says otherwise. He won’t because he can’t, because it does not exist.”

The community leaders are opposing Abdullah Rashid for one singular reason: He is infringing on their power in the community, Guandolo said.

“The Muslim Brotherhood runs that community, and Rashid is an outsider. That’s what is going on,” he said. “Law enforcement needs to understand the threat before this situation deteriorates, and they should begin by locking up the terrorist leaders from Hamas doing business as CAIR for being terrorists, and Rashid for imposing foreign law on citizens of Minnesota.”

German intelligence services say they have identified a terror sleeper cell made up of at least 40 women operating within the country’s most populated state.

The head of the North Rhine-Westphalian Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV), told Germany’s Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung newspaper Tuesday that the women follow a strict Salafist code of conduct — from how to raise children and cooking ingredients, to how to interpret the rules of Islam and stir up hatred against Christians, Jews and other non-believers.

The result, said Burkhard Freier, could be something “much more difficult to dissolve, namely Salafist pockets within society,” reported the German news outlet DW.com.

The German government has welcomed more than 1.5 million Muslim migrants into its borders just in the last three years, leading to increased crime, sexual assaults and terrorism. Many cities could not even hold their traditional Christmas markets this holiday season without armed guards and concrete barriers to ward off would-be terrorists like the one that killed 12 and wounded 56 in Berlin last Christmas.

Freier also revealed that the female sleeper cells have been indoctrinating young children to hate Westerners. “Salafism has become a family affair,” he told the news agency.

The 40 so-called “sisters” have also won the approval of their male counterparts. They are well aware that women can be more useful than men in Western societies in putting forth the “peaceful” face of Islam on the one hand, while preparing for war on the other.

This is the phenomenon I warned about in my book, Stealth Invasion, in which generations of non-assimilated Muslim migrants grow up in a parallel society — forming a nation within a nation over a period of years. Once this type of insulated society establishes a foothold in a country it is virtually impossible to root out short of an aggressive police crackdown, which some analysts fear could spark civil war in countries like Sweden, the UK and Germany. So far, no Western nation has been willing to take on that risk, opting instead to kowtow to Muslim leaders who demand that Muslim “civil rights and civil liberties” be placed above common-sense national security measures.

The BfV chief’s remarks followed reports by Germany’s DPA news agency, which revealed that German authorities had classified several dozen Muslim women and young people as potential risks to domestic security.

It remains unclear what the government intends to do about its findings or if the women have even been detained.

The number of Salafists in Germany has reached epidemic levels, according to reports in the German press.

Muslims who practice Salafist Islam hearken back to the fundamentalist roots of Islam as practiced by Muhammad and the first caliphs. It is the fastest-growing sect and encompasses much of mainstream Islamic scholarship coming out of al-Azhar University, the primary school of Sunni jurisprudence and a hotbed of Muslim Brotherhood activity.

Recently leaked intelligence reports indicate the governments of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Qatar are fueling the growth of the Salafist movement in Germany. And the reports found there is virtually no difference between one group’s missionary work and its jihadist theology.

While these numbers out today are truly shocking, remember that even more dangerous than the quantity of migration into the U.S. is the quality. In most cases these are not your great-grandfather’s immigrants, who came to Ellis Island with a sponsor and were ready to learn English, work and become Americans first, not Italian-Americans, German-Americans or Irish-Americans, just plain Americans. Many today are purely economic migrants who harbor no intentions of assimilating and will seek to “get” whatever they can from the U.S. Treasury in the form of welfare payments, meaning they will be a sure vote for the Democratic Party. Those who do find jobs will send a portion of their checks back home in the form of a remittance. The United Nations, as part of its 2030 Agenda signed onto by Barack Obama and 190 other world leaders, says nations should make it cheap and easy for migrants to send remittances and that wealthy nations must also offer affordable healthcare, housing, transportation and education for all Third World migrants crossing into their borders, legally or illegally.

By LEO HOHMANN

Newly released Census Bureau data shows that 1.03 million immigrants, legal and illegal, settled in the United States in the first six months of 2016, an astonishing number by all historic comparisons.

The 1 million figure amounts to a typical year’s worth of immigrants that came to the U.S. in six months during the waning months of the Obama administration.

The numbers for the first half of 2016 represent a 13 percent increase over the same period in 2015, a 24 percent increase over 2014, and a 53 percent increase over the first half of 2011.

If previous patterns held up, that means a total of 1.8 million migrants likely entered the U.S. in all of 2016, according to projections by the Washington-based Center for Immigration Studies.

The data comes from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey and shows a dramatic rebound in the number of new immigrants settling in the country, since bottoming out in 2011, when new arrivals fell after the Great Recession.

Newly arrived immigrants include new permanent legal residents with government-issued green-cards, long-term term “temporary” visitors such as guest workers and foreign students, along with new asylum seekers and illegal immigrants.

Steven Camarota, the Center’s director of research and co-author of the report, called these dramatic increases “truly extraordinary.”

“Our generous legal immigration system allows in a huge number of immigrants and then permits them to sponsor their relatives creating a multiplier effect,” he said.

Camarota was referring to the controversial policy of “chain migration” that has contributed to nearly 14 million immigrants settling in the U.S. between 2006 to 2016.

“The numbers have profound implications for American schools, taxpayers, workers as well as our culture and national security,” he said. “Yet the whole system is allowed to run largely on autopilot with few asking whether any of this makes sense for our country.”

View the entire analysis at CIS.org.

Based on past patterns, it seems almost certain that when data becomes available for all of 2016 it will show 1.8 million new immigrants arrived in 2016, matching 1999 —the highest level of new immigration in a single year in American history, according to CIS.

The 1.8 million migrants who likely came in 2016 and the 1.6 million who came in 2015 are a continuation of a dramatic rebound in immigration since 2011. In 2014, 1.5 million came, in 2013 1.3 million arrived, in 2012 it was 1.2 million and in 2011 1.1 million new immigrants settled in the country.

Not your great-grandparents’ immigrant

Regions showing the most dramatic increase in new arrivals between 2011 and 2015 are Central America (up 132 percent), South America (up 114 percent), the Caribbean (up 64 percent), and the Middle East and South Asia both up 52 percent. South Asia includes Indian, Pakistan and Bangladesh.

Let’s not forget that just two weeks ago the Bangladeshi migrant, a Muslim named Akayed Ullah, who came to the U.S. on a chain migration plan, tried to blow up the Ports Authority bus terminal in New York City. The bomb in his suicide vest malfunctioned and didn’t fully explode, but if it had police said dozens would have been killed and possibly hundreds injured.

Bangladesh and Pakistan are both Muslim-majority nations with active jihadist infestations with a direct pipeline to the United States through chain migration.

Check out my article from last week about the massive uptick in illegal asylum seekers showing up at the U.S. border, most coming from Central America but a surprising number from India, Pakistan and African nations such as Eritrea. 

Further evidence of a renewed border surge was reported this week by the San Diego Union Tribune.

Mexico remains the top sending country, with 190,000 immigrants (legal and illegal) settling in the United States in 2015, and 216,000 likely coming in all of 2016. While the number of new arrivals from Mexico has roughly doubled since 2011, the number coming remains well below the annual level more than decade ago.

The dramatic increase in new immigrants settling in the United States in recent years is primarily driven by the nation’s generous legal immigration system, both long-term temporary visa holders (e.g. guest workers and foreign students) and new permanent residents (green cards).

The decision to admit large numbers of unaccompanied minors at the southern border, along with the adults traveling with them, likely accounts for some of the increase in new illegal immigration, particularly from Central America.

While disturbing in itself, the article below should not be read as an isolated incident. Mainstream media outlets have been bending over backwards for years to cover up Islamic crime, especially in Western cities receiving large numbers of Muslim migrants. Pakistani sex-grooming gangs operate across the UK, raping little English girls with impunity, and the official UK media response has been silence. It was only by a stroke of luck, which I write about in my book ‘Stealth Invasion,’ that the grooming gangs were exposed in one city, Rotherham, and after it could no longer deny the horrific reports of abuse and coverup the British media tried to convince the public that the problem was contained to that one city. In fact, the Pakistanis continue to operate their disgusting grooming gangs in cities across the UK. I have encountered the problem of media bias in favor of Muslims first-hand, at newspapers for which I worked in the past. Part of it is caused by fear — fear of blowback from aggressive Muslim civil rights groups like CAIR but also fear by reporters/editors for their own safety. Some have personally confided in me that they don’t want to lose their heads for pursuing the truth about Islam and that I must be crazy for doing so. We saw the media covering for Muslims who act badly in Sioux Falls, S.D., earlier this year, when a Muslim armed with firearms and 1,000 rounds of ammo terrorized a Christian conference, an incident totally ignored by the local newspaper, which reported the story only AFTER my report hit WND.com. We saw it in Twin Falls, Idaho, in 2016 when a 5-year-old girl was sexually assaulted by three migrant boys from Sudan and Iraq, and we saw it in Minneapolis when an entire neighborhood was terrorized by Somali thugs for three straight days in June 2016. All of these media blackouts and more are documented in “Stealth Invasion,” which you can purchase at Amazon.

By LEO HOHMANN

Morgan Evenson was walking home in downtown Minneapolis on the evening of Dec. 13 when a black man got out of his car, chased her down, tackled her and repeatedly thrust a 3-4-inch blade into her flailing body.

The 26-year-old computer-store clerk frantically fought back, kicking, scratching and screaming for help.

At some point, neighbors heard her screams and came to her aid. Her attacker – described as a Somali man in his early 20s, about 5-foot-7 with a slight build and wearing grey stone-washed jeans – ran away.

Evenson was left bleeding on the curb with 14 stab wounds on her arms, neck and back. Her kidney was lacerated. She was lucky to survive the attack.

It happened while she was walking home from the Apple Store, where she worked, about eight blocks away from her apartment. That’s when the man attacked her for no apparent reason. Police, who have not made any arrests in the case, are calling it a botched robbery.

Police said the case was unusual for the level of brutality employed just to get a woman’s purse. But some Minnesotans are wondering if there isn’t more to the story, if maybe the young redhead’s assailant didn’t want more than just a purse.

The Minneapolis Star-Tribune, the city’s largest newspaper, has been  completely AWOL on the story.

The newspaper’s on-duty news editor, Maria Reeve, did not return my calls Tuesday to inquire about why it went dark on such a brutal, unprovoked attack on a defenseless, unarmed woman walking home from work.

Other media, such as the Southwest Journal, have reported on the crime but left out the assailant’s full description as a Somali migrant.

Only one media outlet, local ABC News affiliate KSTP, included in its on-air coverage the fact that the victim described her assailant as Somali, but the station’s website article failed to mention that fact.

Watch KSTP’s description of the attack and the suspect

A friend of Evenson’s started a GoFundMe page to raise money for uncovered medical costs.

The page said Evenson was readmitted to the hospital Dec. 19 to monitor a recurring fever and blood pressure.

As of Tuesday afternoon the GoFundMe page had raised more than $15,000 for uncovered medical bills.

No isolated case

The case of Morgan Evenson continues a pattern of Somali crimes being covered up, downplayed, lightly investigated and eventually falling off the radar in Minnesota.

For a list of other notorious coverups by the Minnesota media and law enforcement see the full version of this article at WND.com. The list of victims includes the 40-year-old Australian woman Justine Damond, who was shot by a Somali cop after she called for help, an entire neighborhood on Lake Calhoun that was terrorized by Somali thugs for three straight days, three people who  lost their lives in an apartment explosion, and even the Somalis themselves who must endure a “Sharia cop” enforcing Islamic law in their neighborhoods without consequences from the corrupt Minneapolis Police Department.

Debra Anderson, chair of ACT For America’s Minnesota chapter, said she has been trying for four years, without success, to get Minnesota sheriffs to train their departments to better prepare and deal with Sharia-related crime such as FGM, honor violence and terrorism.

She said it was telling that no police response was recorded in the stabbing attack on Morgan Evenson. Her life was saved only because she fought back and her screams were heard by people living and working in the area.

“It was interesting the articles I read didn’t say anything about the police coming. Not a thing. Just sounds like the classic media template used in Europe,” Anderson said. “You had to get all the way through that KSTP [broadcast only] report to find out he’s Somali, and it was never mentioned in the other media outlets at all.”

That’s very disconcerting for someone who has been trying to educate Minnesotans about the pitfalls of kowtowing to the Somali community and its “civil rights” advocates at CAIR.

“It’s unofficial but Minnesota law enforcement agencies are enforcing, or at least tolerating, Shariah law. Most people don’t know it yet but the police are not here to protect the indigenous Minnesotans anymore,” Anderson said. “They have been incrementally changing their search policies and their use of force policies for years. We’re not being protected anymore. They’re protecting the Muslims, so it’s becoming increasingly like Europe. Yes, it’s here now.”

Read the entire article and reader comments at WND.com

The 32-year-old Afghan migrant who plowed his SUV into a sidewalk full of Christmas shoppers in Melbourne, Australia, Thursday, has a lot in common with the more than 1,200 unwanted refugees Australia is sending to the U.S. under what President Trump has called a “dumb deal” negotiated by his predecessor, Barack Obama.

The carnage Thursday was caused by a maneuver that was “deliberate” but not necessarily tied to terrorism, Australian police said in the aftermath of the attack, which injured 18 and left a preschool boy fighting for his life in the hospital with traumatic head injuries.

Not only was the attacker Afghan (and, therefore, likely Muslim), but he has a history of mental health issues, said Australia’s chief of state police.

The suspect, whose name has not been released, is an Australian citizen of Afghan descent who used a technique, car ramming, that has been repeatedly recommended by the Islamic State over the last two years.

What should be disconcerting to every American, and what’s not being reported by the establishment media, is that the U.S. has agreed to take up to 1,250 rejected Muslim asylum-seekers off of Australia’s hands, most of them from Afghanistan and Pakistan along with stateless Rohingya Muslims from Burma and Bangladesh.

The deal was negotiated by the Obama administration, and Trump reluctantly agreed to honor it, calling it “dumb” in a tweet just weeks before taking office.

But here’s the bombshell. The head of Human Rights Watch Australia, Elaine Pearson, recently admitted to the New York Times that the mental health of these American-bound refugees has in many cases deteriorated due to their prolonged incarceration on two remote islands, Manus and Nauru, offshore from Australia.

The New York Times reported the following on Dec. 12:

“If the U.S. isn’t going to accept people from certain countries, they should make that crystal clear now so Australia can make alternative arrangements,” said Pearson, the Australia director for Human Rights Watch. “There’s no time to waste – these refugees have acute mental health problems made worse by years of uncertainty and insecurity on Manus and Nauru.”

Given that Western governments like to write off most Islamic terrorist attacks as merely a case of “mental illness,” it’s astonishing that a human-rights advocate hoping to relocate Australia’s rejected Muslim refugees would admit they are all in a dire state of mental health.

“I hope people are making the connections here,” says refugee watchdog Ann Corcoran of Refugee Resettlement Watch. “We are talking about Muslim refugees from Afghanistan, Pakistan and Burma/Bangladesh with ‘acute mental health problems.’”

The U.S. has already been acquainted with Muslim jihad by vehicle. Uzbek migrant Sayfullo Saipov launched the Halloween attack on New York City, driving his rented Home Depot truck through a crowded bike path, killing six innocent people. He arrived in the U.S. compliments of a diversity visa lottery held annually by the U.S. State Department. And a Somali refugee drove his car into a crowd of fellow students at Ohio State University last year, injuring several.

Now, back to the Australian deal. The first batch of 54 Muslim refugees arrived in the United States from Australia on Sept. 27, according to the Times. They will be followed by another 200 refugees on Jan. 12, according to the State Department. They will continue to arrive throughout fiscal 2018 as Australia empties out its detention centers of illegal boat people.

While nobody knows how many of these refugees will be violent, their profile resembles that of the Melbourne attacker who injured 18 people by ramming his car into pedestrians on a crowded street – Muslim and mentally ill.

‘Free to roam’

Trump famously called Obama’s deal to take unwanted Muslim refugees off the hands of Australia a “dumb deal.”

So with the Australian human rights advocate shouting from the housetops about these refugees’ sorry state of mental health, Corcoran believes it is beyond dumb for the Trump administration to honor the deal.

“This is worse than a dumb deal, it is stunningly stupid and dangerous,” Corcoran says. “And, all to get a political monkey off Australian Prime Minister Turnbull’s back?”

Corcoran says the worst part of the deal is not only that these refugees are coming but once they get to America they will not be monitored by the government in any way. That would be profiling.

“These are mostly single men, they will come here and they will be free to roam, they’re not going into detention here like they were on the two islands off Australia,” Corcoran said.

“Is your town ready for your New Americans?” she wrote in a recent blog. “Muslim men who have mental health problems from years in detention with only other men who will be free to roam your neighborhoods.”

Then comes the question of chain migration.

Once the refugees taken off of Australia’s hands arrive in the U.S., will they be allowed to invite their relatives to join them in the U.S. from back home in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Burma and Bangladesh? It would seem they would, as preventing them from doing so would amount to “discrimination based on religion,” which is always the sticking point that seems to get Trump’s immigration policies snagged in the courts.
“This deal gets dumber every time we hear about it,” Corcoran said.

But one thing is certain. Australia obviously knows something about these refugees that makes them undesirable. They were willing to take several hundred Central Americans holed up in a U.N. refugee camp in exchange for the Muslims being detained on Manus and Nauru islands.

“We’re not taking families we’re only taking single men, which is just insane, it’s just insanity,” Corcoran told WND. “These are invaders, and no town is going to know they are coming unless someone lets the cat out of the bag. The State Department isn’t releasing where they are placing these refugees.

“They’re free then to go where they wish. Nobody tracks them, nobody knows where they are.”

This story originally appeared at WND.com