Dominion Voting Systems: Firm at center of election fraud claims has ties to globalist World Economic Forum and Soros enterprise

Dishonest scales are an abomination to the LORD, But a just weight is His delight. Proverbs 11:1

Most Americans have no idea that, in the vast majority of states where electronic voting machines are used, final ballot tabulations are not handled by their state and local governments, and haven’t been for years.

In the early 2000s, county and state governments began to farm out the tedius process of tablulating election ballots to private technology companies. It would be faster and more efficient, the tech giants promised.

So they did away with paper ballots and everything went digital.

When sporadic issues cropped up across the country, Americans cried foul and demanded a paper trail. The software companies were happy to oblige.

They reponded by allowing the voting machines to spit out what appeared to be a paper “ballot.” This made everyone think they had the ability to scrutinize their ballot choices, making sure the piece of paper they held in their hand showed the correct names of the candidates for whom they voted before running it through a scanner and officially “casting” their ballot.

This whole process has now been exposed as a clever mirage, an act of chicanery by the technology wizzards.

That piece of paper you held in your hand was not really a ballot at all.

It was a symbol of the ballot but not a ballot.

Your actual “vote” was a digital blip of data on a hard drive that would get transmitted over the Internet to your state’s election headquarters. Whether your vote for Donald Trump actually made it through that transmission process without being changed to a vote for Joe Biden is now an open question.

Breitbart explains further how the process works:

“Some of the most popular ballot-marking machines, made by Election Systems & Software and Dominion Voting Systems, register votes in bar codes that the human eye cannot decipher,” according to a February report by Associated Press.

But according to researchers, that’s a problem, as “voters could end up with printouts that accurately spell out the names of the candidates they picked, but, because of a hack, the bar codes do not reflect those choices.”

“Because the bar codes are what’s tabulated, voters would never know that their ballots benefited another candidate.”

Many political analysts and journalists, myself included, warned back in 2003 and 2004, when many states were switching their systems over from actual paper ballots to this new electronic format, that this would take us down a dangerous path.

The democratic process is totally dependent on transparency, trust and accountability — three things that private tech firms are not known to possess in large quantities.

Tech firms are notoriously always trying to protect their proprietary codes and algorithyms — the inside guts that make their products perform.

So when claims of fraud arise, it’s almost impossible to find where exactly things went wrong. That’s why election officials like to skim over such claims with “oh it was just a glitch, nothing to see here, move along.”

The politicians refused to listen to the cautionary warnings, which were dismissed as “prophets of doom” who just wanted to resist the tide of technological advancement in the modern era. They gleefully turned their election systems over to Big Tech.

Fast forward to 2020 and everyone’s worst nightmare has arrived.

We are seeing the disastrous results of the decisions made 15 to 18 years ago in almost every state. Last Tuesday’s presidential election was fraught with irregularities, and the most difficult ones to get to the bottom of will be those which involved Dominion Voting Systems, used by every one of the key battleground states whose ballot counts are being called into question.

Listen to bombshell interview with Lt. Gen. Thomas McInerney — The Hammer is the Key to the Coup

Evidence in Antrim County, Michigan, where 6,000 votes were switched from Trump to Biden, lead many to believe that this was just the tip of the iceberg in a software system that may have been infiltrated by an outside source, namely the HAMMER Scorecard program [see yesterday’s post, Did American Patriots get HAMMERED by deep-state globalists?].

Elections authorities in Michigan were quick to write off the 6,000 vote switch as a “glitch” caused by “human error.”

“In computer software development lingo, a ‘glitch’ is slang for an unintentional software malfunction. Voting software that switches votes means that it was intentionally programmed to do so,” says Patrick Wood, editor in chief at Technocracy News and Trends.

“This is an extension of Big Tech’s dictatorial stranglehold on censorship of opposing ideas,” Wood adds.

Below is an article from the Center Square, which probes deeper into America’s disturbing history of turning over the most important facet of its democratic process to super-secretive tech giants run by people with shady backgrounds. Pay particular attention to the connections to George Soros and the World Economic Forum, a globalist organization that I have reported on at length over the last year, focusing on its push to completely restructure the world order around socialistic technocracy.

By Bethany Blankely, The Center Square

The Dominion Voting Systems, which has been used in multiple states where fraud has been alleged in the 2020 U.S. Election, was rejected three times by data communications experts from the Texas Secretary of State and Attorney General’s Office for failing to meet basic security standards.

Unlike Texas, other states certified the use of the system, including Pennsylvania, where voter fraud has been alleged on multiple counts this week.

Dominion Voting Systems, a Canadian company headquartered in Denver, is one of three companies primarily used in U.S. elections. The others are Election Systems and Software and Texas based-Hart InterCivic.

The Dominion system was implemented in North Carolina and Nevada, where election results are being challenged, and in Georgia and Michigan, where a “glitch” that occurred reversed thousands of votes for Republican President Donald Trump to Democrat Joe Biden.

While Biden declared victory Saturday in his U.S. presidential race against Trump, the Trump campaign is launching several challenges to vote counts in states across the country, alleging fraud.

Dominion’s Democracy Suite system was chosen for statewide implementation in New Mexico in 2013, the first year it was rejected by the state of Texas.

Louisiana modernized its mail ballot system by implementing Dominion’s ImageCast Central software statewide; Clark County, Nevada, implemented the same system in 2017. Roughly 52 counties in New York, 65 counties in Michigan and the entire state of Colorado and New Mexico use Dominion systems.

According to a Penn Wharton study, “The Business of Voting,” Dominion Voting Systems reached approximately 71 million voters in 1,635 jurisdictions in the U.S. in 2016.

Dominion “got into trouble” with several subsidiaries it used over alleged cases of fraud. One subsidiary is Smartmatic, a company “that has played a significant role in the U.S. market over the last decade,” according to a report published by UK-based AccessWire.

Litigation over Smartmatic “glitches” alleges they impacted the 2010 and 2013 mid-term elections in the Philippines, raising questions of cheating and fraud. An independent review of the source codes used in the machines found multiple problems, which concluded, “The software inventory provided by Smartmatic is inadequate, … which brings into question the software credibility,” ABS-CBN reported.

Smartmatic’s chairman is a member of the British House of Lords, Mark Malloch Brown, a former vice-chairman of George Soros’ Investment Funds, former vice-president at the World Bank, lead international partner at Sawyer Miller, a political consulting firm, and former vice-chair of the World Economic Forum who “remains deeply involved in international affairs.” The company’s reported globalist ties have caused members of the media and government officials to raise questions about its involvement in the U.S. electoral process.

In January, U.S. lawmakers expressed concern about foreign involvement through these companies’ creation and oversight of U.S. election equipment. Top executives from the three major companies were grilled by both Democratic and Republican members of the U.S. House Committee on House Administration about the integrity of their systems.

Also in January, election integrity activists expressed concern “about what is known as supply-chain security, the tampering of election equipment during manufacturing,” the Associated Press reported. “A document submitted to North Carolina elections officials by ES&S last year shows, for example, that it has manufacturing operations in the Philippines.”

All three companies “have faced criticism over a lack of transparency and reluctance to open up their proprietary systems to outside testing,” the Associated Press reported. In 2019, the AP found that these companies “had long skimped on security in favor of convenience and operated under a shroud of financial and operational secrecy despite their critical role in elections.”

Leo Hohmann is an independent journalist, author and blogger. He is not controlled by any corporate advertisers or sponsors and is able to continue putting out his reports only by the grace of God and the generous support of his readers. Please click the donate button to make a donation of any size.

Published by


Independent author, researcher, writer.

23 thoughts on “Dominion Voting Systems: Firm at center of election fraud claims has ties to globalist World Economic Forum and Soros enterprise”

  1. After a brief stint in Seminary & Bible College + a quick 2 year, Community College Associates skin, including Code, Network, and intro-System Administrator, these same fears struck me where it hurts! I rejected the higher Scholarships and just said “no thanks”.

    Too easy to bury a few lines of “random” code to have a set timeframe of execution and “just disappear”!

    Same thing happening in Big Time Religion!

    Job 3:25
    For the thing which I greatly feared is come upon me, and that which I was afraid of is come unto me.

    Say it ain’t so!


    1. However God enabled Job to overcome the thing he most feared as He is helping me now to overcome the thing I most feared happening. This should be true of all those who have put their faith in Jesus Christ of Nazareth.


    Standard Weights and Measures
    14. You shall not have two differing measures in your house, one large and one small. 15. You must maintain accurate and honest weights and measures, so that you may live long in the land that the LORD your God is giving you.16. For everyone who behaves dishonestly in regard to these things is detestable to the LORD your God.
    Berean Study Bible
    Net Bible
    You must use just balances, a just dry measure (an ephah), and a just liquid measure (a bath).
    [many more here, including New Testament, along with honesty] New Century Version (NCV)
    Do not cheat when you measure the length or weight or amount of something. Your weights and balances should weigh correctly, with your weighing baskets the right size and your jars holding the right amount of liquid. I am the LORD your God. I brought you out of the land of Egypt.

    Two of the mamy references from the Talmud
    One should not sift the beans at the top of the bushel because he is “deceiving the eye” by making the customer think that the entire bushel has been sifted. It is forbidden to paint animals or utensils in order to improve their appearance or cover up their defects (Bava Metzia 60a-b).
    Throughout the Talmudic period, the rabbis appointed agronomoi – a Greek word for market commissioners – whose job it was to inspect measures and weights and to fix prices for basic commodities (Bava Batra 89a)


  3. You may view my comment as fanaticism or as a history of ethics. So mamy particulars in religious cannon address honesty. These come from observing the tendency to bow to personal gain where there is an immediate conflict of interest. We should not be surprised. Reagan’s word were “Trust, but verify.”


  4. We need to pray really hard that the lawyers working for truth have no skeletons in their cupboards which Soros, Obama, etc, can use for blackmail. If ever there was justification for living a righteous life this is it. But God . . . . . a glorious and hopeful phrase – But God has not been taken by surprise but I am sure there are many of us who are physically sickened at the corruption and sheer unadulterated evil which is being bandied about as truth.


    1. Lots of good righteous people died in Venezuela, Cuba and other now marxist paradises trying to do the right thing for the country and people they loved and tried to save. I fear we will witness the same here in the soon to be USSA. I fervently hope not, but it isn’t looking good for our side.


      1. From the tone of your reply, it would seem you are no fan of death, why ever not? Do you not realise you will be instantly in the presence of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, that is if you have put your faith in Him, His life, death and resurrection? Have you not read where Paul says: “For to me, to live is Christ, and to die is gain.” Philippians 1:21 – I truly can’t wait. God has promised that He will be with us through everything we experience on this earth. Look, if you can bear to, at the 21 Christians who were slaughered on the beach in Libya when they were given the chance to deny Christ – you cannot tell me that as they responded the Holy Spirit was not ministering the peace that Jesus tells us is passed understanding. It is not just you who mentions death as an, apparently, awful thing, many Christians seem to do that. Does nobody read the Word of God any more? Do you not know that faith without works is dead and if you are fearful of death where is your faith for it is surely not working!


    2. Will the skeletons be fact or fiction? We must demand hard evidence but also consider relevancy in the matter


      1. I make it my practice to never discuss religion or politics with with fanatics of any ilk. Your belief is yours alone as mine is mine alone. That is how it shall stay. I saw all the death I ever want to see in my two tours in the RVN from 1966-68. I am in no hurry. Every day I have lived since then is a bonus I intend to enjoy to the fullest. Good day.


  5. I live in GA and the Dominion system made no sense to me the first time I voted using it. The fact that a hard copy is “printed” for review and “proofreading” purposes, and then fed back into the same system didn’t jive. There are 2 points of failure in the system containing no real time auditing procedure for the actual voter.


  6. Fiction: The Wizard of Oz
    Real life swindle and con: Elizabeth Holmes, founder of Theranos who appeared on the cover of Fortune magazine. She supposedly had a revolutionary machine that could do scores of blood tests with a mere pinprick. With essentially a toy, she conned scores ofsophisticated investors out of hundreds of millions of dollars.
    They lost money. Americans are on the verge of losing freedom. God help us all.


  7. From fiction: hocus pocus machine in the Wizard of Oz
    From real life: Elizabeth Holmes CEO of Theranos , wunderkind of the med tech world in blood testing. She who appeared on the cover of Fortune magazine and bilked sophisticated investors out of millions. Instead of losing money, Americans are at grave risk of losing their freedom.

    Liked by 1 person

Comments are closed.