Software engineers report Dominion flipped ‘minimum of 138,000 votes’ from Trump to Biden in Michigan

A bombshell analysis of four counties in Michigan has been released by a team of mathematical experts led by an MIT-educated scientist that concludes tens of thousands of votes were transferred from Donald Trump to Joe Biden in that state.

Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai, a mathematician, scientist and Fulbright scholar, teamed up with software engineers Bennie Smith and Phil Evans to conduct an analysis of voting data in Oakland, Macomb, Wayne and Kent counties in Michigan.

When officials detected a 6,000-vote switch from Trump to Biden in one sparsely populated Michigan county, Antrim County, they dismissed it as a “glitch.”

Smith debunked that excuse as a bureaucratic fabrication.

“First of all, there’s no such thing as a glitch. No compiled computer code can decide to change its mind,” he said.

The only reason Michigan caught the discrepancy was because someone went to look at the printed-out poll tapes – the raw numbers that come out of the voter machines – and when they compared those numbers to the tabulated results provided by the state, they discovered the numbers did not match up.

You can watch the entire video of Dr. Shiva, Smith and Evans below [at least until the thought police at YouTube take it down]:

As we reported earlier this week, most states abdicated their control over the final vote-tabulation process years ago when they chose to outsource that job to private software companies. verified with an independent software engineer that no “glitch” occurred in Michigan or any other state.

Rex Powell, a Minnesota-based professional with 20-plus years as a software engineer and whose skills include software product evaluation, said it’s a “huge problem” if a state does not have control of the “source code” for the software applications in use.

“Secondly, if the state does not have air-tight system security it is a huge problem. The source code can be down-loaded, modified, and recompiled by the programming staff, then uploaded without anyone knowing,” he said. “Or, a new version of the program uploaded, then taken down and replaced without anyone knowing.”

Recounts are useless

Powell said recounts will not provide any answers as to whether fraud occurred. If fraud did occur, a recount will merely verify the fraudulent numbers. He said only a total system audit has any chance of pinpointing fraud.

“It would not be difficult to determine how tightly controlled the source code has been since the programs were written for each and every state.”

Powell noted that while electronic “glitches” have been discovered, switching Trump votes to Biden, no such glitches were found to occur in Trump’s favor.

According to a report from Politico, a Georgia election official reported a “glitch” had stopped voting in two counties, caused by a vendor uploading a patch into their Dominion Voting system.

“A glitch is an error introduced into the coding process,” Powell explained. “Switching Trump votes to Biden repeatedly would most likely be an intended modification of the program by system personnel, not a glitch. When they talk about a ‘patch’ being added to the system that might include code to recalculate how the system tabulates program summary totals.”

In Georgia, multiple counties received a patch to add to their election software the day before the election.

“If the tabulation is skewed in the favor of a specific candidate through two or more processes, or if the perform statement for the calculations is incorrect…this does not happen by accident,” Powell said.

Strange voting patterns discovered in Michigan

Shiva said in his video presentation that his team discovered patterns in heavily Republican precincts in Oakland County that are too precise to have occurred organically. The graph line produced shows a pattern so precise that it was almost certainly created by a computer algorithm, he said.

“The algorithm moves Trump votes to Biden. The second thing is that as precincts increase with a higher percentage of Republicans, more votes are transferred to Biden,” he explained. “Another way to think about this is, the more a precinct is Republican, the more the percentage of Trump votes were transferred to Biden.”

In the graph below, each blue dot represents a precinct in Oakland County, Michigan, showing early voting trends doing a nosedive in near total unison, to the point where 40,000 votes went from Trump to Biden.

The ability to shift votes from one candidatge to another is called a “weighted race feature” and this feature is written into all four of the major elections software companies that are used across America, Smith said. It’s not limited to Dominion.

In the final analysis, a total of 93,000 votes combined for Oakland and Macomb counties got changed from Trump to Biden.

In Kent County, another heavily Republican county in the Grand Rapids area, the algorithm kicked in again and shifted an additional 45,000 votes from Trump to Biden.

“Even if you wanted to believe Republicans were just starting to hate Trump and although they still remain Republicans they voted for Biden, they wouldn’t do it in such a perfect line [across hundreds of precincts],” Shiva said.

Previous reports on this website suggested that a secretly commandeered program called the HAMMER/Scorecard may have been used to hack into voting systems and switch votes from Trump to Biden. While that program does exist and it could have been employed, the jury remains out on whether it was used.

What we do know is that HAMMER was not the only potential method of redirecting votes from Trump to Biden. This feature was written directly into the Dominion software program purchased by 28 states and, according to Smith, exists in the other systems as well.

“In three major counties [Oakland, Macomb and Kent] Trump’s margin was reduced by a minimum of 138,000 votes,” Shiva said, enough for Biden to claim victory. “This means Trump’s total was decreased by 69,000 and Biden’s increased by 69,000.

The phenomenon did not appear to be employed in the heavily Democrat Wayne County, which includes the city of Detroit.

“This transfer was done by a computer algorithm,” he said. “The number that got transferred to Biden, increased in Republican precincts and was less in non-Republican based precincts,” Shiva said.

‘Get educated or be enslaved’

“We live in a world right now of media companies which cherry pick what they want. They have an agenda. And it really comes down to us,” Shiva said, who described his team as non-partisan [Smith is a Democrat]. “We have election issues that people get excited about, but we need to take a step back and see what it means to be a citizen. The citizenry has been sleeping. We’ve outsourced our decision making to politicians who have their agenda, and we end up with voting systems with inputs and outputs that are unverifiable. But, most importantly, the key takeaway is that I think it’s time you get educated or be enslaved. If we want to truly be free citizens it requires some significant participation on our part.”

Shiva said inputs and outputs from electronic voting machines “ought to be unambiguous.”

It shouldn’t take a software engineer to go back and decipher whether an election was free, fair and accurately tabulated.

“In the systems we have we don’t have voter registration cards, we don’t really have authentication [of the input], some places do, but we don’t have receipts to prove it was really you who voted in that voting booth.

Can you prove you voted at a given precinct?

“The other part is the output. We’re assuming the output reflects what actually happened in the booth.”

He said most of the systems do nothing of the sort.

The way they are designed, the voter does not get a valid receipt that proves they are who they say they are and that they voted for Candidate A or Candidate B. “You cannot prove it was really you that went into that booth and voted.

“The outcomes, as we shall see, can be manipulated, so the evidence is not really evidence.”

Sheva said it remains very ambiguous who is actually voting where in the U.S. electoral system. And once a vote is cast, the outputs can be manipulated.

“But we assume the inputs and outputs are clean.”

He said most ballots are machine counted.

“Your vote is converted to a ballot image and read by a machine. The ballot images are the ballots that are counted, but unfortunately many of the states are getting away without saving these ballot images.”

This is a violation of federal statute, which requires states to save all documents related to federal elections for 22 months.

Shiva said he filed a Freedom of Information Act request with his home state of Massachusetts to see the image of his actual ballot. He was denied.

The computer algorithm in question has been identified by the team as a “weighted case allocation method.” They believe it originated from the original software program written by Diebold Inc. and passed on to other companies through mergers and acquisitions.

“To get down to the heart of the real problem, we are all engineers, software engineers, we are not politicians. So the question is, why are more Trump votes transferred to Biden in precincts that have more Republicans?

Are both parties aware of these features in these voting systems?

Is it possible that these patterns are just normal, not any algorithm? We had a big discussion among our team on this because we know this is a big important issue for our entire country.

The trend line is in such a tight pattern as to be obvious, something Sheva called a “red flag.”

“It makes no sense, unless, a computer algorithm was in place to lower Trump’s votes as a function of percentage of Republicans in a precinct. That curve, boom, it goes down linearly. What we’re saying is that beautiful point where it’s nice and flat, Trump is actually doing well in Republican precincts and then it’s like a switch gets turned on and it goes down, linearly. Our position is, that could only be done by computer algorithm in such a precise way over so many precincts.”

Evans estimates the statistical chances of that happening naturally would be less than 1 percent.

“It’s begging the probability that it’s natural,” Smith said. “It’s artificial.”

Is a coup d’etat underway?

“Is a coup underway?” asked Sheva. “And, if so, who would be behind such a coup? Democrats or Republicans or both?

What cannot be denied is that the U.S. elections system is deeply flawed.

The ballot inputs and outputs are unverifiable – and maybe that’s the way certain powerful forces want them to remain, for obvious reasons.

The team recommends the following steps be taken to fix the broken U.S. system.

  1. Issue citizens a permanent voter registration card that includes a photograph.
  2. Require elections software vendors to use open-sourced software. “All these systems are owned by a few companies, and we can’t even go in and see what switches are turning on,” Sheva said. It should be open sourced and transparent.
  3. Use handmarked paper ballots. “This is such a viable solution to this because if at any point you want to remove the computers from the process, you can arrive at an output. The documented feature of a weighted election is such a bad idea.”
  4. Save ballot images pursuant to federal law and post them on the Internet for verification purposes. “Nobody counts the paper anymore, the machine counts that image,” Sheva said. “That ballot image is the ballot. So, as we know, those ballot images, many of the states are deleting them after the election. If you have the images, put them up on the Internet and we can all do an automatic recount.”
  5. Require automatic audits of every state’s voting system after every election. “You shouldn’t have to wait until there’s a problem,” Sheva said. “Public companies have to be audited on a quarterly basis but not state elections’ agencies? This is one of the most important things where counting is done, and in that process there is no audits.”
  6. Publish precinct-level data or “poll tapes” on election night. “All of those numbers should be published immediately. In the old days they had the town crier who would automatically go out and announce to the public, ‘Shiva got this many votes and his opponent got this many votes.’ Not anymore. Instead we wait until the poll data is transported somewhere else and that’s another place where the vote can be manipulated.”

Decentralize the system

When election night ends, each of the machines generates the actual results but we don’t get to see those results right away. As Sheva says, there’s no local town crier to keep people honest.

“It’s not decentralized like it used to be,” Shiva said. “When you centralize everything and give it to some company, that’s where manipulation can take place. You can reduce that significantly if, right when the data comes, you town-crier it out.”

This is not ‘voter fraud.’ It’s much worse

Smith said there’s a tendency to broadly frame the problem as “voter fraud,” but that only serves to downplay the severity of what amounts to a national crisis.

“Everyone is wanting to say it’s voters committing fraud. It’s not voter fraud. It’s election fraud,” he said. “It’s systemic.”

Sheva agrees.  He said “we the people” need to rise up and demand reforms that restore accountability to America’s election system.

“Those in power always try to flip it onto their constituency. I think most citizens would not have a problem getting a voter registration card,” he said. “I think some of these things are purposely done so you can deviate people’s attention onto something else and keep the real fraud continuing, in these systems.”

Leo Hohmann is an independent, freelance journalist and this site is totally reader supported. If you appreciate his reporting, please consider making a donation of any size.

Published by


Independent author, researcher, writer.

54 thoughts on “Software engineers report Dominion flipped ‘minimum of 138,000 votes’ from Trump to Biden in Michigan”

  1. would like to see the same analysis done on democratic candidate to see if the linear line goes in the opposite direction, if that analysis is correct, democratic candidate should show a linear line opposite of the republican candidate?


  2. A compelling presentation, but to test it I created a simulation: which demonstrates the flaw in their analysis. Basically, the more Republican the district, the less chance it has to beat Republican expectations. I think there are real issues surrounding this election, that shouldn’t be sidelined.


    1. One small flaw in creating your random numbers of voters. The numbers generated can exceed the maximum number of voters. Multiplying a random number by the voter count four times could generate a max of 4X the actual voter count. The simulation should subtract the generated voters from the voter count for the first three categories of voters, then use the remainder as the fourth category.
      *Pseudo code*
      spdem: Math.random() * voterCount,
      sprep: Math.random() * (voterCount-spdem),
      biden: Math.random() * (voterCount-spdem-sprep),
      trump: (voterCount-spdem-sprep-biden)
      So in essence, the simulations as it is, proves fraud, as more votes were cast then voters.


      1. I misread the simulation. Max vote per type, became Max Votes – my bad – apologies. A helpful simulation would to show the reverse for Biden by exchanging the trump/biden variables. It should show the exactly same graph. This may lend credence to the old saying that figures don’t lie, but liars do figure.


  3. This report of Michigan voting is very interesting but seem to stop short of a complete analysis. If votes were switched from Trump (which the data suggest) then it should show up in a similar analysis for Joe Biden. I would like to see this analysis done in Pennsylvania and Wisconsin or a few counties in each of those states. I think Sidney Powell would be very interested in this type of data analysis


  4. Pingback: Bits & Bytes |
  5. Your work has always been stellar! This is the most in-depth explanation of the calculated and well planned election fraud, that I’ve read. Thank-you so much for all your excellent and high level articles. As bad as things currently are, I strongly prefer to know/understand the facts and evidence.

    This election was in your face thievery, and it’s been in progress for more than four years. Not stopping the two tier system of justice in it’s tracks has led to an even bolder assault on Liberty through the electoral process. Nothing less than an even bolder reaction to this theft is going to work.

    This is much more than just stealing an election. This is a coup; they’re trying to overthrow the United States government and a sitting president who won a second term. Should the people allow this to occur, there will be no 2024 comeback for Repubs or Indies or Greens or any other party, it will be COMMUNISM under the guise of “democratic socialism,” the doorway into communism.

    We are in a revolution not a Civil War as the left wants you to believe. We have to save our constitutional republic.

    All those that think things will get better ought to recall , Seattle, and all the other riot insurrections.


    I cringe at the thought that we have fallen this far as a country. Trump threatened life as they know it to the political class. This is the result of that threat.

    Perhaps a silver lining is Trump forced them to rush things and they turned up the heat in the kettle a little too quickly. The fate of the free world, what is left of it, hangs on a cliff. Hopefully our current path can be arrested in time.

    The Great Reset isn’t going to be what they think.
    The New Normal is not going to be what they planned.

    I live “behind enemy lines”. I’m surrounded by mask-loving, hive-minded social justice warriors who equate dissent with farting in church. No wait, sorry… they don’t bother with church…

    The point is, do what you know is right simply because it is right. Think of it this way: only a smallish fraction of Americans actually fought against King George. And if Patriots today are the bigger or smaller fraction, size of heart and commitment is the ultimate winner.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. From the simple information that was given it looks to me like the algorithm may be applied mostly to republican counties. Is this a possibility?


  7. The computer issue is just one problem but those on the left cheated on multiple levels for the very purpose of not being able to pinpoint the fraud. For instance, the dumping off of illegal boxes of ballots for Biden at 4:00 in the morning so that they can show that he won despite the computer “glitch”. I think Trump has a chance if they can prove the fraud and justify reason to recount and also verify the ballots as legit. I mean, I left my son in the emergency hospital, with a serious infection, so that I could run off to vote real fast before polls closed and I guess the dems are offended that I would want to make sure that my vote wasn’t canceled out by a rigged system or an illegal vote (service dog, etc.).


  8. Fair enough, I guess we’ll see (or not, if the truth gets buried). In the meanwhile, I’ve got other priorities to deal with; I’ll leave election craziness to itself for a while. Perhaps I’m wrong about Dr. Ayyadurai’s graph, but I doubt it. One weak argument causes me to doubt other (perhaps stronger) lines of argument — but my own role in all of this is rather inconsequential, so for now I feel I’ve given it the attention it warrants. I will try to keep an open mind about whatever evidence comes up, however.


    1. With deep respect, and mainly because the onlooker often sees more of the game, you do come over as a bit arrogant and stuffy. If you had disquiet over what Leo posted why on earth did not not contact him privately. Rather on the principle Jesus gave us when dealing with somebody who has sinned against us. It is always a lot more courteous to, firstly, deal with a disagreement privately, don’t you think?
      This is Julia Pomeroy posting – too long a story to explain why it is me and not my husband!


      1. This is Ian’s wife, Julia, here – too long a story to explain why, suffice it to say my laptop has crashed at the moment. Thanks Leo for your gracious response to Tim. Sadly at the moment when I post some of your stuff on the English broadsheet The Times 99.9% of those who respond to me seem to be screaming out, evidence, evidence, evidence and I am so shocked at their unbelievable ignorant. Do they truly know nothing? Do they really believe a lawyer is that stupid? I fear that just like Marxism so often uses accusations at us of which they are guilty, that this is true of them too. So sad, these are my fellow countrymen. Of course it is not long before the ‘thought-police’ come along and delete that which I have posted as it “violates their policy” – in other words their policy is to keep truth at an all time low. This is very sad because, at one time, this was the one reliable newspaper we had!
        Keep up the good work Leo, no investigative journalist or reporter worth their salt just posts anything willy nilly, they do research first!

        Liked by 1 person

    2. So your saying that if conservatives lost faith or favor in Trump…they would simply vote for Joe Biden and Kamala Harris instead? That would not be a very conservative thing to do…

      Liked by 2 people

      1. Could I remind you, and, no doubt, many others that the word ‘your’ is the third person plural
        possessive pronoun, it has ansolutely nothing to do with the verb TO BE – iin other words what your second should have looked like is: “you’re” short for “you are”! The kind of sentence in which the word you used would be when defining the ownership of, say, a book – my book, your book! I know this might rub you up the werong way but I am continually being rubbed up the wrong way by people writing this simple phrase – you are – shortened to you’re – correctly. I am also English but then the English are equally as sloppy.


      2. Your conscience has clearly failed you if you voted for Biden. How do you vote for abortion up till birth? How do you vote for lockdowns, which lead to failed businesses and mass suicides? How do you vote for a candidate more committed to China’s national interests than those of your own countrymen?

        Liked by 1 person

  9. I watched Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai’s video, and I think he makes some good points about election transparency vis-à-vis voting machines. However, I wonder if there is a more simple explanation for his graph: vote-splitting. That is, some people who normally vote democrat voted for Trump. We would expect more “outliers” for Trump in Democratic precincts, since we could expect more people there to vote straight ticket Democrat (and if they split for Trump, they likely still voted for the other Democratic candidates). On the other hand, people in traditionally Republican precincts who were going to split their ticket would have split to Biden. What is really telling is the 50% “tipping point” precincts, where one might expect equal splitting on both sides. However, Dr. Ayyadurai’s graph seems to show that more Republicans in those 50-50 precincts split for Biden. That’s why Trump lost the election — he lost some of his base. That makes sense to me anecdotally, as I know conservatives who did not vote for Trump, but still voted for other Republican candidates. If voting machine companies secretly inserted bias algorithms into their machines, that would be the scandal of the century, but surely someone would show us the code. Until I see direct evidence in the form of fraudulent code, I am not swayed by graphs that have a more simple explanation.


    1. Tim, I could not disagree more strenuously with your argument on behalf of the systemic cheaters. Have you investigated the backgrounds of the people who are in charge of Dominion and its subcontractor, Smartmatic? One is on the transition team for Biden! Another endorsed antifa on his social media accounts. You seem all to quick to trust people who have no reputation for trustworthiness. As Reagan said, trust but verify. Hopefully they will be required by a court to turn over their source coding, but don’t bank on it.

      Liked by 2 people

      1. I don’t doubt that there are accounts of high-level corruption in government or industry that are stranger than fiction, and you are right that I have not investigated the backgrounds of the companies involved or their associations. I’m not an investigative reporter — I’m just a minister with a day job who is trying to responsibly make sense of wildly differing versions of reality that I keep hearing on the internet. I took the trouble to study Dr. Ayyadurai’s video because he seems to be making an honest attempt to support claims of election fraud with tools that I can understand. I’m not claiming to be an expert, but I think many people with a good high school math education could grasp the statistics involved. It’s not rocket science. My only point is that his analysis does not convince me and I attempted to say why. His analysis instead corroborates what I already suspected: that many conservatives have lost faith in Trump and split their vote accordingly. Personally, I have a rather low view of human nature — our capacity for selfish manipulation, rationalization, and abuse of power is very troubling, and I need to look no further than my own heart for proof of these tendencies. However, “election fraud” is a very specific claim that for me requires better proof than what I’ve seen so far. Conspiracy theories are sometimes true, and often not true.


      2. You seem to have constructed a version of reality which maybe helps you deal with the craziness we’ve all been subjected to, and I get that. But it’s time to open your eyes. I agree that some conspiracies are true while others are just “theories” but what separates the two are the evidence. If you look into the guts of Dominion and SmartMatic you will be horrified at what you find. Are you aware that Mr. Peter Neffenger sits on SmartMatic’s board and is also on Biden’s transition team? Are you aware that the CIA has used this software to turn elections in other countries? It’s all very sketchy. As for the evidence of fraud, it is so voluminous that it’s hard to keep up with, and continues to flood in every day, albeit in generalities in most cases. No good lawyer presents the details of his or her evidence to the public before presenting it at trial (for obvious reasons), but also don’t forget that it’s the same cast of characters who attempted to silence conservative media and protect Biden from all tough questions and all critical reporting is now quashing all reports of massive election fraud. Coincidence? I think not.

        Liked by 2 people

      3. I would like to see the same analysis for Joe Biden. if the same thinking is applied to Joe Biden then we should see the opposite effect for his votes, right?


  10. Thank you for your efforts in exposing the truth. As Americans that’s all we want is a fair election but that seems impossible with these Democrats we have in our government right now.


  11. Thus has been going on for years. For the most part, it is the only way the Demonrats can hold power in the biggest cities. This is absolutely a travesty and it is up to “We the People” to fix the problem. The Deep State” (Illuminati) strike again.

    Liked by 1 person

  12. If you can’t on the up and up cheat I guess but I guess the democrats don’t understand that we the people have the final say with force if it comes to that

    Liked by 1 person

  13. Thank you again Leo for seeking the truth with your God given talents to bring clarity from a video with some what an esoteric subject. Keep it coming !

    Liked by 2 people

  14. Here’s another issue: the recounting, auditing, verification, whatever, should NEVER be done by the same people that did the original tallying. That’s just absurd!


  15. I hope it is okay to post my comment here? Gentlemen, as the French would say: “Plus peu, plus tard” (too little too late) your goose has been cooked, alas!


    1. Thats like catching a thief in your house with his pockets full of your stuff then stating ‘se le vi’ Off you go with my stuff now because its all in your pockets so it must belong to you.

      Stupid people would say ‘to late’. Smart people would say don’t move. Then call the cops so they can ‘investigate’ the crime. Have the criminal empty the pockets, arrested and hauled before a judge. If/when found guilty then sent to prison…


      1. YOu truly have no idea how deep the ‘swamp’ is do you. Exaristo para poli kyrio! You would have been far better offd correcting my abysmal French!


      1. Oui tu est vrai, je suis desolee. I really ought to know better than that stupid mistake! Thank you, trop, trop merci!!!!!!!!!!!!! Joke)


    2. You must not know our Country very well. We the People are not a group of Laissez-faire individuals. No Goose has yet been cooked. Tu es tres Ignorants.


  16. I want to know if this has happened in all the states where they have given the win to Biden? This is a bunch of shit and America deserves better! If this is the only way Democrats can win then they surely deserve to lose! America we deserve better!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Yes
      Massive election fraud was committed
      This will lead to the fall of the Republic, which is the PLAN of the Godless globalist progressive Marxist democrats


    2. The majority of Washington State -outside dog-wagging tail Seattle- is red. The ‘Loren Culp For Governor’ lawyers are alleging Secretary of State Kim Wyman allowed just under 1,000,000 ballots to be counted as votes that were not registered State of Washington voters. The evidence for this has not been presented as yet, but the link to the story is below.

      Meanwhile -It’s time for Trump Conservatives find each other on Social Media, get together on occupying their OPEN local precinct positions as Prescinct Committeemen. They’re volunteer positions -200,000 of which are VACANT ALL ACROSS THE COUNTRY!

      Check the link below on how to become a Precinct Committeemen.


Comments are closed.