Death by Injection: Top insurance researcher provides data showing staggering numbers

Using data from the United Kingdom, a top insurance industry analyst estimates 600,000 Americans per year are dying from the Covid shots

The United States has become one of the worst countries in the world when it comes to medical transparency. But one smart analyst has found an end-run around the U.S. system that places a dark shroud of secrecy over common statistics.

The U.K. has been more transparent with its data. And that’s where some are going to get stats that allow them to calculate the number of excess deaths in the U.S. since the roll out of the controversial Covid jabs two and a half years ago.

Those who trusted the system and took the Covid vaccines have a 26 percent higher mortality rate on average compared to those who declined the jab – and the death toll is even more staggering for vaccinated people under 50 years old, where mortality is 49 percent higher than for those unvaccinated.

These numbers are based on government data from the U.K. and were brought to Wisconsin Senator Ron Johnson’s attention by Josh Stirling, one of the nation’s top insurance analysts and formerly Senior Research Analyst for U.S. nonlife insurance at Sanford C. Bernstein & Co. Listen to the clip below from his recent testimony, which of course received zero coverage in the corporate mainstream media.

Published by

leohohmann

Independent author, researcher, writer.

31 thoughts on “Death by Injection: Top insurance researcher provides data showing staggering numbers”

  2. Pingback: Daily Shmutz | COVID-19 / Malicious Medical Quackery  | 6/4/23 – KrakenNews.us

  4. There is a report out there saying that by 2025 the US pop would decline by 70%.
    This was apparently contrived by some sort of remote vision back in 2012, which I cant accept. I dont believe in psychic visions, esp. to that extreme.
    But even if it were to partially happen, what a better way to do it is for the vaxxed
    to suddenly get sick and die, God forbid.

    Like

      1. Yes thats it, sorry I missed that April report. But again i understand who Deagel is and what they do. Needless to say i dont trust them, esp. this report that I have read at MM said it was contrived by some remote psychic means.

        BUT as you say many things are announced and are in broad daylight for all to see and then they happen. So it should be heeded, but maybe with some ‘salt’.
        2025 is only a year and a half away so something big would have to happen fairly soon. Either as the WHO said another pandemic that would only kill those in the West…..sounds a bit weird, targeting only the NATO countries
        doesnt it?? Or a nuclear event?? Whats your opinion Leo?
        .
        Hmmm, one or the other certainly would put the ’24 election in doubt. Then Obama would have his 4th term.

        Like

      2. I believe the authors of the Deagel forecast were given info about what the 2020’s would bring, which is bioengineered plagues, famine and WWII. It also appears they believed the US/NATO would not fare well in the coming world war.

        Like

    2. An EMP that took power down for more than a few days or weeks would lead to the death of most people in the U.S.

      People in rural areas with common sense would likely survive if they were at least somewhat prepared and had access to water.

      But people in the cities would likely die because there would be pretty quickly be no access to sanitation, food, water. And they’re less likely to be prepared, know what wild plants are edible, how to grow food and have seeds, etc.

      That is only one of many ways we could see a huge decline in population.

      Liked by 1 person

  5. Mike Adams had just asked that question to an interviewer on his show. Please, send it to him, thank you. My iPhone doesn’t work properly.

    Like

  6. What I don’t understand is if there are all these deaths, where are the obituaries? I live in a large county in Calif. I still get my local paper. I keep expecting to see a massive surge in obituaries but that hasn’t happened. I follow Ed Dowd and I wish he’d give the names of the other insurance companies that have had a significant rise in claims. I tried to find that info on various company’s quarterly reports, but it was too hard to figure out. Ed knows how to do it, I wish he would.

    Like

  8. What about the “shedding” that some have warned about, from those who got the shot to those who did not? And what about all the tainted blood and plasma we have now saturated our nations blood and plasma (and organ donations) supply with from those who got the shot? Just because someone did not get the shot does not mean they are not or will not be affected/infected!

    Liked by 5 people

    1. I think, pretty much every “viral disease” has a toxic load shedding parallel the “Industrial Medical Cartel” refuses to acknowledge.

      Like

  9. Well, in a nutshell, we were right.
    Those of us with a backbone to not get bullied and brainwashed have the reward of our lives and health. I hear about it all the time around me, people who got the shot and got covid anyway, more than once even, got an adverse reaction or vaccine injury, or died from the shot or the covid that came as a result of the shot. I feel sorry for them all but what can you do, I warned but they didn’t listen.

    Liked by 5 people

    1. 1blandina: So few with backbone and common sense, so few cannot think for themselves. I was alerted that this was an experimental vaccine, not approved by FDA, besides it takes sometimes ten years on trials for approval with drugs or vaccines. So I started taking zinc and vit. D and stayed out of crowds since flu season was active. This proves how many sheeple trust news and gov. push for vaccines by Trump, Fauci, Gates. State politicians (governors,mayors, others incl)

      Liked by 1 person

    1. No, I don’t think he explained that fully. There are several reasons: one is that the higher mortality rate for people who had only one jab instead of two is that many stopped after one shot because they had a severe adverse reaction, and then they died shortly after, so they weren’t alive to get a second jab : (

      Liked by 3 people

      2. Leo – “…and then they died shortly after, so they weren’t alive to get a second jab”

        Thank you, Leo for consistently keeping us informed. Probably many readers personally know or know of someone who had a severe reaction. Just through one friend alone, I know of three people – one of them died in the ICU. My friend had asked us for prayers because she was the aunt of her daughter-in-law.

        I’ve also heard a warning from one expert that there will be a large number of delayed reactions in people who did get the second (or third) jab, which will be evident in a couple years.

        Liked by 1 person

      3. Leo – The United States has become one of the worst countries in the world when it comes to medical transparency.

        Worst, also, for every other kind of transparency, as you’ve dramatically demonstrated in many of your stories. Leo, you have excellent sources, which is a Godsend for the rest of us, because it’s getting harder and harder for readers to find information on the Internet that doesn’t tow the party line these days. Several years ago we made the switch from Google to Duckduckgo for searching, and were delighted that it enabled us to find a wealth of information that wasn’t propaganda. It’s only within the last several months especially that I’ve noticed with alarm that Duckduckgo seems to have also succumbed.

        Like

      4. I’ve been using DuckDuckGo for over five years and for at least the last two years it’s been no different than Google. You can’t find anything that’s not mainstream corporate media. Does anyone know of a search engine that isn’t compromised and biased toward the globalist establishment?

        Like

      5. Leo – I’ve been using DuckDuckGo for over five years and for at least the last two years it’s been no different than Google.

        That is surprising to me, because I found it to be more helpful when looking for content from a more balanced perspective, especially compared to Google which is so rabidly left. But you have that investigative journalist background, which I don’t, so you may be more wary. Since I’ve been commenting on this website, it seems like conservative sources I’ve been looking for through duckduckgo have dried up. Or maybe I’m becoming more wary…

        Like

      6. Yes, it’s gotten very difficult to find any conservative sources on DuckDuckGo. Case in point, I just searched “Odesa” because I wanted historical perspective on that key city in the Russia-Ukraine war, and all I’m getting is msm reports. A couple of days ago I searched for an article, using the exact headline, that I knew had been posted at The Gateway Pundit — nothing from TGP came up. This search engine has been totally corrupted. Like I said, I started noticing it a couple of years ago and it’s gotten progressively worse.
        I saw something a few months ago about a new start-up search engine that did not black out the conservative angle but I didn’t write it down and now I can’t remember the name of it. If anyone knows of it, please post the name.

        Like

      7. Leo – “A couple of days ago I searched for an article, using the exact headline, that I knew had been posted at The Gateway Pundit — nothing from TGP came up.”

        I just typed The Gateway Pundit in duckduckgo and most of the links were to negative articles about TGP – couldn’t find any of their stories. So they’re definitely scrubbing the Internet. Since I’m not a techie, I’m not sure how they’re doing it other than updating software algorithms to catch certain words/phrases and then disabling links posted by “offending” contributors. Who knows – maybe they’ve accelerated the process by using AI.

        After just reading a little about ddg in Wikipedia, I came across this:

        On March 1, 2022, in response to the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, DuckDuckGo paused its partnership withYandex Search. On March 9, 2022, Weinberg said in a tweet that DuckDuckGo will down-rank sites associated with Russian disinformation, a move which some users criticized as censorship and a violation of the search engine’s commitment to “unbiased search.”

        So much for commitment to pursuit of the truth!

        Like

    1. Veronica Daniel – Here is a link to a internal medicine specialist I follow.

      That was a good video – thanks for the link, Veronica. It’s encouraging to see all these gutsy medical professionals speaking the truth. Doctors Robert Malone and Peter McCollough are two others.

      There is a coalition of like-minded doctors and scientists with the nonprofit Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency who started a Freedom of Information Act document lawsuit pushing for release of all Pfzer vaccine safety data on the mRNA vaccine. The FDA had imposed a 75-year timeline for rolling out this information – essentially a gag order on the truth. Their lawsuit succeeded and in January 2022, U.S. District Judge Mark Pittman ordered that all of the hundreds of thousands of pages of data be released by the end of an eight-month period.

      One of the alleged controversial substances in the vaccine was graphene oxide, the existence of which had been vociferously denied by the mainstream media.

      The following is a link to the Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency website, to one of those documents the FDA released, “Structural and Biophysical Characterization of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycoprotein (P2 S) as a Vaccine Antigen.”

      Click to access 125742_S1_M4_4.2.1-vr-vtr-10741.pdf

      Page 7 states the following: “3.4. Cryo-EM of P2 S For TwinStrep-tagged P2 S, 4 μL purified protein at 0.5 mg/mL were applied to gold Quantifoil R1.2/1.3 300 mesh grids freshly overlaid with graphene oxide.”

      Since this came out, I haven’t seen any further mention of graphene oxide by the state-run mockingbird press. But I did find this report to the European Parliament: “Time for the truth on the presence of graphene in the COVID-19 vaccines” 1-24-22, by Sergio Berlato (ECR):

      https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/P-9-2022-000303_EN.html

      This report was published soon after Judge Pittman ordered the FDA to release all safety data on the Pfzer vaccine.

      Berlato’s statements:

      “A recent investigation by Dr Ricardo Delgado Martin and the technical report by Dr Pablo Campra ‘Detection of graphene in COVID vaccines by micro-Raman spectroscopy’ claim that the COVID-19 vaccines contain graphene. As reported by CORDIS in 2018, a team of researchers has proven that graphene is able to convert electronic signals into signals in the terahertz range, with trillions of cycles per second.”

      “The silicon-based electronic components we use today generate clock speeds in the GHz range, where 1 GHz is equal to 1 000 million cycles per second. The scientists showed that graphene can convert signals with these frequencies into signals with frequencies that are thousands of times higher than those created by silicon.”

      “Graphene is therefore able to absorb radiation, meaning that, if contained in a vaccine, it would be highly toxic and harmful to human health.”

      Liked by 2 people

      1. You are welcome. I willl definitely view the link you shared. I follow Dr. McCullough. His vitality is amazing. He’s all over America doing interviews etc. I’d love to have his energy. I too appreciate the doctors, scientists, lawyers and other professionals like Leo Hohmann who proved to care and share truth regardless of possible backlash from their peers and the communists (or whatever name you choose) trying to control us with lies and fear. Honestly Leo’s readers are some of the few people I interact with, albeit virtually. Not that I’m antisocial but we sold our business retired and moved to a mini-farm 10 years ago. We saw this coming. The first person I heard mention graphene was Karen Kingston. MSM ignored her but she was correct. I honestly appreciate the information you just shared.

        Liked by 1 person

      2. Veronica Daniel – “I too appreciate the doctors, scientists, lawyers and other professionals like Leo Hohmann who proved to care and share truth regardless of possible backlash from their peers and the communists (or whatever name you choose) trying to control us with lies and fear. Honestly Leo’s readers are some of the few people I interact with, albeit virtually.”

        I’m glad you found it helpful, Veronica! Yes, this is a great website and really unique, because of Leo’s background in investigative journalism, and being a born again believer, plus his comments section allows people to “think things through” if they feel a need to post something that’s longer than two or three sentences. The tone of conversations is encouraging too, unlike the combative atmosphere you can often find on other websites – even conservative and/or Christian ones!

        The whole issue of the graphene oxide is a thorny one, because I’ve seen stories that said it was definitely not in the vaccines (mostly mainstream media), others that it definitely was, still others that said it was only used in testing or manufacturing the vaccines. One story I read after posting my comments here stated that the reference in the FDA report to graphene was within the context of testing and therefore it wasn’t an ingredient.

        And graphene is just one of the materials Pfzer used – who knows what others are really in there, because last night I came across a second report to the European Parliament that mentioned trade secrets of pharmaceuticals. Here’s a link to a report by Teuvo Hakkarainen that was issued in August 2021, “Do the Sars2 COVID-19 vaccines contain graphene oxide?”

        https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/P-9-2021-003980_EN.html

        An excerpt from that:

        “Graphene oxide and its toxicological risk are a hot topic in nanopharmaceutical research this current decade. Occasionally it is claimed to be a trade secret with labile pharmaceutical formulations, and, accordingly, there is no separate mention of it, for example, in patent applications for Sars 2 COVID-19 vaccines. Graphene family nanomaterials (GFN) are not approved for internal human use.”

        Then Teuvo asks a couple really good questions:

        “Can the Commission say whether mRNA or DNA vaccine formulations approved for use in the EU actually contain GFN additives, even if this is not evident from the applications?”

        “What practical steps does the Commission plan to take to guarantee the safety of the population if those dealing in vaccines have not released this background information but instead have kept it secret?”

        So far, I haven’t found any follow up stories, such as if the Commission ever took any “practical steps.” In the previous link I posted to the report by Sergio Berlato to the Parliament in January 2022, at the very end, he asked, “In the light of this recent investigation, does the Commission intend to have an independent laboratory perform a careful analysis to check for the presence of graphene in the COVID-19 vaccines?”

        It’s been really difficult trying to dig up the truth about graphene oxide in the vaccines in light of all the contradicting articles (and sometimes fluff) on the Internet!

        Like

Comments are closed.