European elites are pushing for a war they are not prepared to fight against an enemy they cannot defeat without pushing the world to the edge of nuclear armageddon. At that point, all bets are off.
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer closed out what amounted to a war summit in London Sunday by pledging more billions for missiles to Ukraine and committing to British “boots on the ground and planes in the sky.”
He called for a “coalition of the willing” to bolster his war effort against Russia.
No longer satisfied to use Ukraine as a proxy, he now wants to sacrifice his own nation’s sons and daughters. If he and his evil twin in Paris can get their way, they will launch strikes against Russia, get their soldiers killed, then play the victim and hope this is enough to drag America into their self-provoked war with Russia. At that point, all bets are off and we launch recklessly into World War III.
Watch Starmer, below, addressing his fellow Europeans, saying they are doubling down on their support for Ukraine in its border war with Russia. Remember as you listen to Starmer’s rantings, Ukraine is not a NATO member, but the Euro-elites talk about the country as if it is, with no risk, even the risk of nuclear holocaust, being too high for the preservation of this one country’s borders. Ask yourself, why? Why is this country’s borders so sacred, when so many other countries around the world have ongoing border disputes and nobody cares?
Remember, it was former UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson who flew to Kiev in April 2022, just a couple of months after the full-scale war started with Russia, to talk Zelensky out of making peace with Putin. Britain has always been the main driver of this war, right from the beginning. But are they capable of engaging Russia in direct military conflict, even with the help of France and a few others in the “coalition of the willing?”
Zelensky has previously said European partners would need to station 100,000 to 150,000 soldiers in Ukraine to effectively confront Russia and get it to pull out of Ukraine. Trump has ruled out sending American troops so that means Europe will have to go it alone, something Europe is not known for doing.
The U.K. and France are considering deploying a much smaller European-led peacekeeping force with up to 30,000 soldiers, the Telegraph reported.
Apart from the U.K., Canada and France, other countries remain reticent about sending their troops to Ukraine, citing concerns over the escalation and limited military resources, according to the Washington Post.
Starmer said world leaders had agreed to keep military aid flowing to Ukraine, and to continue to help the country bolster its defense capabilities in the event of a peace deal.
He also announced a new $3 billion loan for Ukraine backed by profits from frozen Russian assets, and $2 billion in export finance for the country to purchase missiles.
Hungary’s Viktor Orban, who seems to be Europe’s only sane leader, said Europe chose war instead of peace at the London summit, adding:
“This is bad, dangerous and mistaken.”
Slovakia’s Robert Fico has also announced he has opted his country out of Europe’s war plan.
Canada’s lame-duck prime minister, Justin Trudeau, of course, is all in. He said over the weekend that Canada would also commit troops to a military coalition if needed to keep the war going in Ukraine.
Not only do Britain, France and Canada not have sufficiently trained troops in sufficient numbers ready to go against Russia, but these countries also do not have the industrial capacity to churn out enough weapons and ammunition that such a fight would require. Remember, the Russians are outproducing NATO countries 3 to 1 on the production of the all-important 155mm shells so crucial to the meat-grinder war going on in Ukraine. They know they can’t go it alone, but they are calling Donald Trump’s bluff, trying to force his hand to join their war plan. But Trump made it clear he doesn’t consider this Russia-Ukraine border war to be America’s fight. He wants it over.
In a post to Truth Social, Trump said Zelensky’s statement Monday to AP that the war could last a very long time, was “the worst statement that could have been made, and America will not put up with it for much longer. It is what I was saying, this guy doesn’t want there to be peace as long as he has America’s backing and, Europe, in the meeting they had with Zelensky, stated flatly they cannot do the job without the U.S. Probably not a good statement to have been made in terms of a show of strength against Russia. What are they Thinking?”
Donald Trump seems to be trying to realign the world by drawing Russia away from China and into the U.S. orbit. That, if he can pull it off, would be a monumental achievement, and one that would make the world a much safer place.
Russia never saw China as its natural ally. It was forced to explore that relationship by unrelenting lies and provocations from NATO, which has encircled Russia’s western flank over the last 20 years by allowing Romania, Poland, Finland, the Baltic nations and Sweden, among others, into its anti-Russia military alliance while at the same time offering membership to Ukraine. That sole act of courting Ukraine for NATO membership amounted to a declaration of war against Russia, but what the Europeans didn’t bank on was Donald Trump coming in and tearing up their plans for destabilizing Russia, fomenting a regime change and stealing its resources. That was always the plan, as evidenced by a June 23, 2022 congressional hearing titled “Decolonizing Russia: A Moral and Strategic Imperative.”
After the overthrow of the USSR, as reported by Ben Norton, the neoconservative operative and future Vice President Dick Cheney wanted to slice up Russia into several smaller countries. Former U.S. National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski even published an article in elite Foreign Affairs magazine in 1997 proposing to create a “loosely confederated Russia – composed of a European Russia, a Siberian Republic, and a Far Eastern Republic.”
They believe if they can just replace Putin and install a Western puppet, they’ll achieve this unrealistic pipe dream.
They clearly don’t understand Russia and its proud history of fending off all threats from the West. And that history predates Russia’s ascendancy as a nuclear power.
This site is independent and ad free. I depend solely on my readers for support, no government handouts or corporate sponsorships. If you appreciate these updates and wish to support the site, you may send a donation of any size c/o Leo Hohmann, PO Box 291, Newnan, GA 30264, or donate via credit card below.
LeoHohmann.com 
Three posts yesterday (3/9/25) on X.
“Exit NATO *now*!”
(Republican Senator from Utah Mike Lee)
” WW1 and WW2 were started by these people…They *will* start WW3…Trump will not be in office forever. If we should get another warmongering president, we will be used again to back another endless war. So, getting out of NATO now in preparation for what happens after Trump.”
(Former Pennsylvania Republican senatorial primary candidate Kathy Barnette)
“We really should. Doesn’t make sense for America to pay for the defense of Europe.”
(Elon Musk)
The majority of us who are conservatives would be delighted if President Trump removed us from NATO. Let these grifters pay for and fight in the wars they start.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Typo: Should be Three posts yesterday (3/8/25) on X.
LikeLike
With regard to dropping bombs, European leaders are about to unleash the biggest one ever against humanity: the antichrist. He is being groomed by Klaus Schwab and the rest of the EU globalist elites to take his place on the world stage as der Fuhrer’s horrible successor. No surprise that eventually he will plague Israel by his odious presence there because Europe has been good at breeding rabid antisemites.
The first birth of a monster on that continent cost the lives of 75-80 million for the dozens of nations involved. Such an astronomical figure would have been far greater (millions more) if America had been forced to go ahead with the invasion of Japan instead of dropping the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki which precipitated a swift surrender.
“The Atomic Bomb Saved Millions-Including Japanese?An invasion would have meant massive casualties. War would have dragged on until 1947 or later.”
(Wall Street Journal Opinion, August 5, 2020)
It’s too bad that Europeans never learned their lesson after such a catastrophic war. Last year, Germans were “beginning to discuss whether the country will eventually need its own nuclear weapons amid fears of U.S. disengagement with Europe, even as Germany continues to spurn nuclear power” (Sky News, February 28, 2024). Talk about this is ramping up again in that nation and joins the chorus of voices shouting the same in France and Poland.
Whether Europe is posturing or not in their publicized march toward nuclear armament, that plus their steady NATO creep eastward, is perceived as a threat in the eyes of Russia, which has no reason whatsoever to trust the West.
In spite of European leaders’ attempted sabotage of peace efforts, Trump is willing to use whatever tools he has to bring warring parties to the negotiating table. He is considering expanding on the economic punishment Biden used against Russia. Yesterday he posted the following on Truth Social:
“Based on the fact that Russia is absolutely `pounding’ Ukraine on the battlefield right now, I am strongly considering large scale Banking Sanctions, Sanctions, and Tariffs on Russia until a Cease Fire and FINAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT ON PEACE IS REACHED.”
Trump is in an incredibly difficult situation with Zelensky and the rest of Europe pushing against his efforts to end the war and has truly inherited a mess from the previous administration. Compounding the dangers posed by another catastrophic war in Europe are the crazy ayatollahs in Iran likewise pursuing a weapon of mass destruction. But their aspirations might be finished by a day or two’s precision airstrikes without putting boots on the ground and having a protracted war. Nevertheless, until their desired lethal toys are quickly removed from within their reach, that country will be problematic.
I’m grateful that a leader was elected in my nation who has pragmatism with a touch of healthy cynicism regarding our erstwhile “allies” in Europe who are ONCE AGAIN the biggest wildcards for triggering widespread death and destruction. At the same time they are the worst deadbeats for sticking the U.S. with the majority of the defense tab by not paying their fair share.
LikeLike
@Anna
Your comment seems confused. You are a Christian Zionist.
But.…
Christian Zionists believe that the antichrist ‘man of sin’ will pose as the Jewish Messiah.
This would mean that the ODIOUS antichrist ‘man of sin’ to whom you refer , would need to be a SEMITE and a Zionist.
In order for the Jews to accept the antichrist ‘man of sin’ as their Messiah, he would have to be Jewish and be born into the line of David.
The bible does not state that the man of sin will be European such a notion is pure speculation by the Dispensationalists.
The Jewish people expect the Messiah to be born in Bethlehem, which is where Jesus Christ was born. But they have rejected Jesus Christ and are therefore still expecting their Messiah to be born in Bethlehem.
If the antchrist ‘man of sin’ were to convince the Jewish people that he is their Messiah then he would have to be born in Bethlehem as an ethnic Jew.
So, that would make the antichrist ‘man of sin’, a SEMITE. !!!
LikeLike
With regard to a nuclear threat. Here is my opinion ;
The United States is the only country to have used nuclear weapons in warfare. They dropped their bombs on civilians.
“the effects of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings still linger for survivors and their descendants. Many survivors, known as hibakusha, faced long-term health issues like leukemia, other cancers, and chronic illnesses due to radiation exposure”
“Paul Bregman, a navigator on one of the B-29 bombers that participated in the Nagasaki mission, died by suicide in 1985. He reportedly struggled with mental health issues later in life and was deeply affected by the 40th anniversary of the bombing”
Since World War II. the United States has been involved in more military conflicts than any other country in the world.
These include major wars like those in Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan and also their involvement in Libya and Lebanon and of course Gaza.
In my opinion, it’s almost a certainty that Israel will go to war against Iran which will result in the loss of many more lives including the lives of American soldiers.
“Since World War II, over 100,000 American soldiers have lost their lives in various conflicts.” These include wars like Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, and other military operations.
Europe is posturing for a possible war but I think that in reality they are just putting up a show of strength in order to deter any threat from Russia and AMERICA .
Russia’s actions against Ukraine have been a reaction to the provocation of NATO which included America. And we know that it was America’s support for Ukraine which enabled the continuation of the war there.
Trump is giving mixed signals. He seems to have cosied up to Putin and so Europe has every right to feel threatened.
In recent years, American soldiers have been killed as a result of America’s actions in the Middle East and not from any threat from Europe.
All of Europe has only a total of 515 nuclear warheads owned by the UK and France. compared to America’s 5,550 nuclear warheads whilst Russia has a stockpile of 6,257, according to current estimates.
The UK and France received assistance from America which made it possible for them to develop nuclear warheads.
America’s nuclear stockpile and their track record would suggest that they are the most to be feared, especially with a maniac in the Presidential office who has been threatening Greenland and Canada among others,‘
Europeans must also take into consideration the threats that come from Russian military including this most recent one from Apti Alaudinov who is a Russian Major General and commander of the Chechen special forces unit, who said:
“We are people who have a great historical responsibility. If such a situation arises, we should already think about general mobilisation, gather an army of about a couple of million and put them [Europeans] in a position from which they will never get out. And after they want to clash with us, Europe and most of the European states will cease to exist’, “
Ultimately I think that NATO is mostly to blame for the situation in Ukraine. NATO, lead by America, have, for years, been building up tensions on the Russian border such as increased troop deployments and military exercises near Russia’s borders etc.,
The current general in charge of NATO forces is an American by the name of General Christopher G. Cavol.
So, any American who is afraid of nuclear fall out, should consider America’s foreign policy very carefully including America’s alliance with Israel who are believed to have as many as “90 up to 400 nuclear warheads“
The main threat to the world since the second world war has been the feckless American war mongers and this continues to be the case from what I can see.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Unibokk—It’s worth noting that Eisenhower was against dropping those A-bombs. “I was against it on two counts,” Dwight Eisenhower, supreme allied commander, five-star general, and president of the United States, said of dropping nuclear bombs on two Japanese cities. “First, the Japanese were ready to surrender, and it wasn’t necessary to hit them with that awful thing. Second, I hated to see our country be the first to use such a weapon.”
Also: “Adm. William Leahy, President Harry Truman’s chief military adviser, agreed with Eisenhower. “It is my opinion that the use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan,” Leahy wrote. “The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender because of the effective sea blockade and the successful bombing with conventional weapons.” (Both quotes from Washington Examiner article dated July 25, 2023 “Japan Was Already Defeated”: The Case Against the Nuclear Bomb and for Basic Morality” by Timothy Carney.)
At least, regarding the plan to bomb Hiroshima/Nagasaki, there was some argument about it. But the argument to bomb won out, as the Truman administration concluded that the bombings would avoid a massive invasion expected to cost millions of lives on both sides. (However, the US planned to keeping atom bombing Japanese cities—as many as it would take—to force their surrender.) I think Eisenhower and Leahy judged rightly and morally—it wasn’t necessary to drop those horrible bombs. Because even in war, there must be limits to brutality, there are lines that should not be crossed. Since 1945, several administrations—despite the rabid warmongers (like General Curtis LeMay) advising those administrations– attempted to limit nuclear proliferation and to exercise extreme caution regarding their use. I remember the Cuban Missile Crisis and what a tense, close-run thing that was (an anxiety I believe that was later closely matched by the totally mad warmongering in the last weeks of the nihilistic Biden Administration. Thank God for the patience of the Russians) Despite all attempts to limit nukes through the years, both the US and Russia and other nations have enough nukes to wreck this whole galaxy.
However, we do use “nukes” of a sort in modern conventional warfare, such as in the Balkan conflict and Iraq. We use “depleted uranium” in tank/artillery shells and bombs, because of their armor-piercing and bunker-busting capabilities. These are not considered “nukes” but still cause the same environmental contamination, and terrible physical effects on the victims, including the tank crews who fire these shells. Like the radiation damage to people in Hiroshima/Nagasaki, the effects result in cancers and are passed to the next generation as birth defects—I’ve seen some horrible pictures of Iraqi babies severely damaged by depleted uranium. There is some effort by a UN agency to forbid the use of these weapons, but it hasn’t gone far. I think whoever invented such a weapon ought to get down on their knees and beg forgiveness from God.
In the US military, there has always been a faction of extreme warmonger types who would drop nukes to solve every crises. But the grace of God, the advice of these men was not followed—most notably JFK took a firm and courageous stand against them. But now? Can you imagine addled Biden standing up against a fierce Gen. Curtis LeMay or even Trump with his constant threats against everyone??? The Biden administration was pushing Russia so hard that Putin warned that if the West does a first strike on Russia, they will unleash all their nukes “and go down as martyrs”. I don’t Biden took Putin seriously.
Meanwhile, our supposed ally–Israel–has nukes and their policy is that if they feel sufficiently threatened they will nuke their enemy and let come what may. Twice they went to nuclear alert during the 1973 Yom Kippur war. Since then, Netanyahu and his psycho Likkud party rules Israel and have proven to be genocidal in nature, so if a nuclear war starts in the Middle East, they would very likely be the one to do the first strike
.
Someday a nuclear war will happen because nukes exist in great numbers and there is a spirit of irrationality spreading globally. It’s only a question of where and when this calamity comes down on us. The US has dropped out of many of the anti-nuke agreements and that’s a very bad sign. We should lead the way to peace, not to war.
LikeLike
Thanks Kayjae
You make some interesting observations.
Just my opinion, but I believe that America wanted to test the atom bomb on real people in a city environment. I also think that this event was designed to give America a sense of huge power in the world at that time.
Any weapon using depleted uranium, like the ones used in Iraq should be classed as a chemical weapon and be put on the banned list of chemical weapons.
I think, what makes Trump’s current tenure so worrying is his unpredictability. He keeps changing his mind. The tariffs is an example of his wavering. He has a history of failings in his time as a business man and has had to be bailed out numerous times. Sadly he has taken this inconsistency into his politics. He is not consistent, he can throw a wobbler if is his ego is bruised or threatened in any way.
I believe that Trump’s behaviour will be bad for the American economy in the long term,
The Irish Prime minister will heading to America for saint Patrick’s day and there is discussion in the Irish media about how to avoid offending Trump. Other countries are wary of him because a deal made can be broken at a whim. He’s offended and insulted leaders of former allies who supported America in previous wars
One other thing worth considering is Trump’s relentless push to get things done.
I heard a commentor on the radio who said that Trump’s last term in office was [in effect[ cut short when Nancy Pelosi, as Speaker of the House during much of Donald Trump’s presidency, played a significant role in shaping the legislative agenda and opposing many of his policies. Her leadership in the House gave her the ability to block or challenge initiatives that didn’t align with the Democratic Party’s priorities. For example, she was instrumental in opposing Trump’s efforts on issues like immigration reform and healthcare.
So, I think that Trump is pushing his agenda with speed for fear of anything changing which could oppose or interrupt the rolll out of his plans.
LikeLike
Unibokk—WWII saw some extremely devastating bombing by the Allies—(e.g. Dresden, Tokyo 1945). General LeMay carried on firebombing of Japanese cities throughout 1945, resulting in more than 350,000 dead civilians. The Tokyo firebombing in March l945 alone took over 100,000 lives. The last year of WWII was all about mega-death in the rush to end the war.
Even so, I think it’s a stretch to say that the US wanted to see the effects of an A-bomb blast on people. Scientists had long known (through accidents) what radiation could do. The test site in New Mexico where the first blast occurred was ample demonstration of its destructive power. There are three main reasons why Truman decided to drop the bomb: one, to end the war quickly (as the US public could no longer be counted on to continue fighting Japan); two, avoid a costly invasion of Japan; three, to demonstrate to the Soviets that we had a very powerful weapon to counter them. And, for a few years, the bomb did make us top dog in the world.
That said, between 1945-1960, there were nuke “experiments” bombings with both atomic and hydrogen weapons. Some of these involved testing on humans—mainly US army soldiers—now known as the “atomic veterans”, who had suffered cancers and other illness from tactical nuke tests. I knew one of those veterans—he had cancer. In 1946, we dropped a test bomb on Bikini Island, which was the beginning of a series of nuke tests on Pacific Islands. My father, a Navy sailor in 1946, had assisted in evacuating the natives from Bikini Island. One of them complained, saying “why do we have to give up our home? Why do you have to destroy it?” The Bikini Island experiment was yet another one of those colonist-style land grab that ran roughshod over the natives, taking their land, and, in this case, destroying it for “science”. Before the test, a lot of derelict ships with animals penned on board were anchored near the island and were destroyed with the island. A horrible death for the poor animals (I’ve seen pictures). Some observation ships were stationed about 50 miles off and some sailors crowded the deck to watch the fireworks. After the blast, those ships were immediately sent in to photograph the aftermath. My dad said those sailors were exposed to fallout, even set to work swabbing the fallout off the deck, and by the time the ships berthed in San Diego, they were being taken off in stretchers.
Lots of nuke tests occurred in Nevada and New Mexico during the 1950s. I remember being told back then not to eat the snow because of the fallout in it. I think that US science from 1940-1970s collaborated way too much with our military, which directed its research towards nuke and biological weaponry. In the 1950s, scientists conducted biological experiments in several US cities, releasing pathogens from office rooftops. One of them was in my hometown. Not to mention chemical experiments, like LSD etc. Science in the service of the military is very dangerous. Science got badly corrupted. But, in those years, both science and the military were gods, not to be questioned.
Now we can’t get control of our military-scientific-industrial-central banking complex. Can’t even get a real audit of it. Back in Sept 10, 2001, Donald Rumsfeld spoke at a Pentagon gathering and wondered aloud how $2 trillion went missing from the Pentagon accounts. The next day 9/11 happened and the subject was dropped. Trump who is supposedly cleaning “the swamp” of waste and useless agencies, has yet to touch the Pentagon expenses, which is the deepest, blackest part of “the swamp” blowing up our economy and monetary system. The corruption is too deeply ingrained—it would take a complete collapse to reset this.
Trump is indeed wobbly. He talks tough like a mobster (I hate it—so low-class). I wonder who advises him—or if he even listens to advice. He has essentially 2 years to do whatever he wants. When the next election cycle comes; he may find himself blocked by Congress again. We have a very unstable, almost unworkable, government these days.
LikeLike
It’s absolutely shocking what’s gone down over the years. I am very suspicious of politicians now.
Even after the Hiroshima Nagasaki bombings there were tests carried out using human guinea pigs. I remember seeing footage of this event.
“During the British nuclear tests in Australia, including at Maralinga and Emu Field, soldiers were often placed in close proximity to the blasts, sometimes with minimal protective measures. In some cases, they were indeed instructed to simply turn away from the flash of the explosion, unaware of the severe radiation exposure they were enduring.
Evidence has since emerged that these tests were conducted not only to study the effects of nuclear weapons but also to observe the impact of radiation on humans. This has led to accusations that the soldiers were effectively used as “human guinea pigs.” The long-term health consequences for many of these individuals were devastating, with numerous cases of cancer and other radiation-related illnesses reported later in life”
This is one reason that causes me to think that the Hiroshima bombing was also a test. Such is the attitude of many people in power including scientists. We’ve seen this with the roll out of the Covid jab where there is ongoing illnesses which I believe will increase in numbers whilst the truth is supressed.
And yes Trump has a mobster disposition. The only consistency I can think of with regard to Trump is his unfettered support for the Zionist agenda.
I think it was yourself who saw the presentation of the pagers to Trump as a warning , should he fail Netanyahu in any way. I think that you might be correct. It was a very creepy gesture by Netanyahu, in my opinion.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Unibokk–
“I think it was yourself who saw the presentation of the pagers to Trump as a warning , should he fail Netanyahu in any way. I think that you might be correct. It was a very creepy gesture by Netanyahu, in my opinion.”
Yes—I did mention that observation here. But many on the internet have also felt that this “gift” was a not-so-veiled threat. It had such a gangster-like connotation. Coming from a monster like Netanyahu–how could it be otherwise?
I find it very disturbing that nation-states these days are becoming more like the Mob. So many bad actors, so much gross corruption, global corporate looting and piracy, murder, trafficking, mass deception and all kinds of dark things going on. Not much rule of law or statesmanship or humanity, just nefarious dealings resulting in a lot of hurt for a lot of people. No one should feel complacent anymore. I feel especially sorry for the smaller countries which bear the brunt of geopolitical machinations, like Syria experiencing massacres today by the Western-backed rent-a-jihadis. What will these massacres accomplish and for whom?? I don’t believe anymore that this jihadi terrorism is really to impose strict Islam—that’s only a tool for terror–but for something else, for someone else.
Some would say that all this war and trauma is merely the usual human history—that this time in history is no worse than any other. But I disagree–somehow the years since WWI have been much more traumatic and dangerous than other eras. We are approaching some denouement, a really big global change. I feel sorry for the younger generations.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Leo may want to consider posting a story soon on how we Americans can survive nuclear fallout wafting over here from across the pond. (Iodine pills can be helpful.)
If idiotic, feckless European warmongers keep pursuing the destruction of their own countries, all of us here will at the least suffer secondary effects from that continent being reduced to smoldering radioactive ash.
Another lemming is joining the flock rushing toward the cliff:
Poland to require all adult men to take military training and consider nuclear weapons as Trump shifts on Russia
(NBC News, March 7, 1:52 p.m.)
LikeLike
“one way or the other , we’re going to get it.”
This is Trump talking about the acquisition / annexing of Greenland.
Another reason for curbing expenditure on Ukraine.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Unibokk–
It is indeed puzzling what Trump’s strategy is concerning Canada, Greenland and Panama. But I came across an op-ed in RT News by a German commentator offering an analysis on the subject that sounds plausible. The title of the article is “Here’s why Trump really wants to get his hands on Greenland and Canada” by Constantin von Hoffmeister dated Feb 11, 2025. Here’s a quote from it below that kind of summarizes it:
“The roots of this idea, known as the “Technate,” lie in a vision of a society governed not by politicians or financiers but by scientists and engineers, guided by the principles of efficiency, technological mastery, and resource optimization. In the worldview of early technocrats, economic systems based on arbitrary currencies and speculative markets were seen as chaotic relics of the past. Instead, they proposed that energy itself – measurable and quantifiable – should serve as the basis for all economic transactions. The Technate would thus become a self-contained and self-sustaining entity, where wealth is defined by the availability of natural resources, the expertise of its inhabitants, and the seamless integration of technology with governance.”
“However, the Technate was never envisioned as something that could be established in just any location. It required a very particular environment – one with abundant natural resources, advanced industrial infrastructure, and a population trained to navigate the demands of a highly mechanized society. The ideal setting, according to early technocratic theorists, was North America, with its vast mineral wealth, fertile lands, and unmatched potential for hydroelectric and industrial power. Canada, with its rich deposits of metals and minerals, and Greenland, with its untapped reserves of rare earth elements, were integral to this vision. The Panama Canal, as the lifeline connecting the Atlantic and Pacific oceans, would further ensure the region’s strategic autonomy from global supply chains.”
Kind of sounds like an Elon Musk project. Read the whole op-ed.
Recently the news has reported the purchase of the Panama ports from HongKong based owners by a US business consortium, including Blackrock. So I suppose this is the beginning of the Panama canal takeover, using corporate money. However, Trump did not rule out taking it by force–I hope he doesn’t go there!! It would be another bloody business just like what Bush Sr did to Panama in 1989. When will this imperialist aggression stop? Did anyone bother to ask the Panamanians what they think of this?
I’m reading a really interesting book that helps connect a lot of dots about the kind of state the US, UK/EU is evolving into and who really runs US foreign policy. “American Exception: Empire and the Deep State” by Aaron Good. It’s making some waves here. Not an easy read (at least in its first half), but a worthwhile one. If you don’t have time to read that book, check out the book review and interview conducted by Prof. Jeffrey Sachs on Youtube on the SDSN channel “Conversation with Aaron Good, American Exception: Empire and the Deep State”.
LikeLiked by 2 people
The subject of the cited RT op-ed, technocracy, is what I’ve been trying to warn people about for the last eight or nine years. I was schooled on that by the world’s foremost scholar on technocracy, Patrick Wood, some years ago and have joined him in beating that drum, but so few people understand what technocracy really is. Thank you for sharing the article on it, Kayjae. Technocracy is even more pernicious than Marxism or Islamism because it combines the power of government with big corporations and AI technology. Transhumanism, depopulation and total control over all things, living and non-living, represent the final accomplishment of technocracy and I believe Revolution 13 is it’s ultimate fulfillment.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Leo—I find the technocracy thing hard to wrap my head around. Maybe because I’m an old folk now and the best I can do is push buttons on laptops. Much of computer and networking tech—whatever–is way over my head. I once worked as a tech writer for a global information distributor and when I saw the network maps behind all the information distribution, I found that to be absolutely astounding–how deep and extremely far-ranging it went through governments and corporations. I can’t imagine what “technocracy” must look like in its complete manifestation.
I would like to see some visual explanation of technocracy that would help explain all this.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Leo–there an article (part 1 of a series) titled “The Dark MAGA Gov-Corp Technate — Part 1” by Iian Davis published recently on the Unlimited Hangout site. It’s a very detailed analysis of the coming technate, its history and events and people currently implementing this form of government. Elon Musk calls himself a “dark MAGA” in reference to the technocracy philosophy called “Dark Enlightenment” that is discussed (with a link to that subject) provided in this article. Very worthwhile reading.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You can share the link if you want. I will approve it. Musk’s grandfather was also one of the founders of the modern Technocracy movement in the 1930s.
LikeLike
Leo–here is that link to the Unlimited Hangout article: https://unlimitedhangout.com/2025/03/investigative-series/the-dark-maga-gov-corp-technate-part-1/
LikeLike
@Kayjae
“The ideal setting, according to early technocratic theorists, was North America, with its vast mineral wealth, fertile lands, and unmatched potential for hydroelectric and industrial power. “
Very interesting stuff. Your mention of this coupled with your mention of Elon Musk brings to mind the genius inventor Nicola Tesla.
I remember reading about his idea of building a centralised source of energy and then transferring the energy wirelessly through the ionosphere. This would eliminate the need for transporting fuels from one place to another.
If Musk was to develop Tesla’s idea , then he could harness North America/Canada’s potential for power generation and then transport the energy seamlessly through the air to where its needed etc.
I’m a bit rusty on this but I think Tesla began building a tower to transport electricity but JP Morgan pulled out of financing the project.
I think that Musk has more power over the presidency than people realise. I mentioned the colonisation of America by the technocrats in a recent comment and I think that that’s where America is headed. I think that Musk’s DOGE is all about a reset in preparation for what you have mentioned.
So, I think there’s a lot to be considered in what you’ve mentioned and I notice that Leo is on the same page as you .
We live in very interesting times.
May God help us navigate through a world which is rapidly going crazy.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hello Leo , I just watched a short video on MSN which shows a computer developed by Cortical Labs and described by Dr Hon Weng Chong.
“First computer running on living human brain cells shown to the world
In a development that could challenges the boundaries of technology and biology, an Australian startup has unveiled the world’s first commercial biological computer, running on living human cells”
LikeLike
Here’s my iunderstanding:
I think that Europe knows it cannot win a war against Russia, instead they are vying for a share of the pie. Ukraine has incredible natural and mineral resources and is the bread basket of Europe.
Meanwhile Zelensky will continue to be a catalyst for the destruction of Ukraine and making sure that Ukraine will require the so called ‘peace keepers’ to form a military presence in order to police Ukraine at the behest of the ‘globalists’ including Russia.
Zelensky is a puppet who will disposed of should he cease to be of further use to the ‘globalists’
LikeLiked by 1 person
Do you remember that saying “what if there was a war and nobody showed up”? People need to quit being so willing to sacrifice their lives for these ego maniacal luciferians. Although when you read that most of the planet is going to stand up against Jesus Christ himself you have to wonder how many are willing participants now.
LikeLike
I don’t think the issue is so much willingness to sacrifice themselves as it is UNwillingness to confront their illegitimate governments. these autocratic regimes do not even remotely represent their people’s interests anymore, but as long as they keep consenting and obeying, it really doesn’t matter.
LikeLiked by 1 person
🚨AWAITING THEIR GLOBAL RULING LEADER 😶
EU foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, said
‘the free world needs a new leader’ and that it was up to Europeans to take this challenge.
It is strongly believed that out of Europe the Antichrist will arise.
Do they already have someone in mind?
What is the visions for their chosen leader?
A man who detests Christianity, the Holy Bible, the Sacred name of Jesus Christ, Israel … a man who will promise to uphold the very tenents of evil agenda that they idolize.
▪︎Slavery
▪︎Oppression
▪︎De-population
▪︎Destruction of innocence
▪︎Sexual Rights without limits
▪︎Riches for the elite ruling class while the world citizens live in combined poverty
▪︎human / animal experiments without limits … as well as other forms of experiments to continue playing as gods in transforming our sky, water, land, solar system
▪︎ WAR – constant unrest
♦️Leaders from across Europe have expressed their solidarity with Ukrainian leader, Volodymyr Zelensky, after his fractious exchange with JD Vance, the US vice-president, and Trump, who claimed he was not “ready for peace” and accused him of “gambling with world war three”.
It is the ‘FREE WORLD’, aka America that needs a new leader … because President Donald Trump is opposing and undoing everything the deep state/ Global elites put in place under Biden-Harris to bring America to her knees for their GREAT RESET.
War is their friend
Zelensky is their partner
The Antichrist is their God
Israel and Christianity their enemies
Is the European Union linked to the ten toes of Daniel 2 or the ten-horned beast of Daniel 7?
Some speculate that there is some connection.
The precursor to the European Union was the European Economic Community, formalized with the Treaty of Rome in 1957.
The European Union 🇪🇺 definitely seems to be stepping into the role of fulfilling the prophecies of the final kingdom of the world.
》》The European Union could well be a model for the coming “super state” of the Antichrist in the end times.
The “little horn” of Daniel 7:8 arises from a federation of nations, much like the EU
We know that the revived Roman Empire of prophecy is a federation of ten kingdoms.
One of the world kingdoms prophesied in Daniel will be a unified group of nations related somehow to the Roman Empire.
Today’s unified Europe, represented in the European Union, shows the will of the dark-hearted people to unite and lay the groundwork for another such a coalition in the near future.
The word of the Lord cannot be broken.
One day, the Antichrist will rise to power, subduing three of the ten united kings before him.
The kingdom that he leads will wage war against the saints and prevail against them for a time (Daniel 7:21; Revelation 17:14)
(Daniel 7:11; Revelation 19:20) No matter what he boasts, or how powerful he seems, the Antichrist will be brought low by the MIGHTY SOVEREIGN KING that he tried to replicate.
He will be stripped of his might, and consigned to his eternal doom … as will all those who chose to reject JESUS CHRIST as their own Savior.
The final outcome of America, Europe, Israel, Russia, the world, is known only by our Holy GOD, but His word gives us all the clues as to who ultimately wins … and what one must do to be prepared for Victory.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Spot on, Leo. Every word you wrote is accurate.
The British army today is less than 110,000 men strong. The French army has about 270,000 active military and 63,000 reserves, the German army is 63,000 strong. There might be a smattering of troops from the Baltic states to join this. The Canadian have about 90,000 men counting reserves.
By contrast, in 1812 Napoleon led ½ million French to invade Russia (and ended up losing 400,000); Hitler’s sent 3.8 million men to invade Russia in 1941(losing 1 million men). In that invasion, despite the fact that the Soviets lost 4.5 million fighting the Germans, they fought with dogged persistence to Berlin itself.
So what in the world are Starmer, Macron, Trudeau are thinking??? Are they mad? Why is the war in Ukraine so important to continue the slaughter? Why are they so frightened of Russia?
Certainly these characters will work overtime to get the US back to their camp. Hope Trump can resist. (And he better make sure his personal security is excellent if he doesn’t cooperate.)
JFK was seriously wanting to open relations with the Soviets and end the Cold War. He was killed for that back then by the same evil forces that today want war with Russia. Consider how far those evil forces went to maintain hostile relations with Russia—they killed our president and his brother, they ruined Nixon when he participated in detente, and opened relations with China. They did everything they could to ruin Russia after the collapse of the Soviet Union by looting it, and provoked war in Chechneya, Georgia and Ukraine. What next?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Like so many current policies, NATO is actually the problem but was once a solution. IF NATO disbands, Russia will back down.
LikeLike
And the band played on. The Titanic is sinking and the Dems want Marxist socialism for America and hate Trump so much they are willing and eager to sacrifice young people in Ukraine”s war. The party of corruption and evil needs to be demolished.
LikeLike
Do not believe for one moment that Starmer intends to fight a military war against Russia.If he fights a war at all it will be with the super new nuclear weapon that has obviously just been passed into his hands.Do you imagine that Russia will not hit the USA.this threat leaves the ball in your court.Seriously we have all become demented,
and our leaders absolutely mad with their quest for our slavery,both dems and marxists.You were a mite tardy in ww2 coming in when it was almost over and bagging all the goodies,are you now being bluffed?
LikeLike