Move afoot in Congress to ban U.S. airports from secretly scanning passengers’ faces and indefinitely storing their personal biometric data

16 U.S. airports have been working with the federal government to scan people’s faces since at least May 2023 and probably before: TSA program is ‘precursor to full-blown national surveillance state’

There’s a bipartisan move in Congress to end the unauthorized scanning of people’s faces at U.S. airports with the use of facial-recognition technology.

The government’s biometric data-collection program, which has not been widely reported on in the corporate media, has been going on at 16 airports for seven months — at least that’s how long the government admits to it. And most Americans who frequent these airports are completely unaware that they are having their face scans harvested and stored in databanks freely accessed by the U.S. government.

Two senators, one a Republican and the other a Democrat, have stood up and said, enough. This needs to stop.

Senators John Kennedy, Republican of Louisiana, and Jeff Merkley, Democrat of Oregon, introduced legislation on Wednesday, November 29, to end involuntary facial recognition screening at airports. 

The Hill reports that the two senators are aiming to repeal the authorization of the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) to use facial-recognition screening at airports.

The senators say their bill, called the Travelers’ Privacy Protection Act, or TPPA, would prevent the agency from “further exploiting the technology and storing traveler’s biodata.”

The senators stressed that the overwhelming majority of Americans are unaware that they have the right to opt out of the facial screenings. Nobody is asked if they wish to grant permission for the government to scan their faces, it’s just sneakily performed on the spot.

Airports are supposed to have a sign alerting travelers that their photo will be taken as part of the pilot program and that they have the right to opt out, but most passengers say the signs are so small they didn’t even notice them.

I have personally talked with multiple airport passengers, including one former U.S. congresswoman, who said she had her face scanned and the airport personnel did not ask her permission beforehand.

Senator Kennedy said in a statement:

“Every day, TSA scans thousands of Americans’ faces without their permission and without making it clear that travelers can opt out of the invasive screening. The Traveler Privacy Protection Act would protect every American from Big Brother’s intrusion by ending the facial recognition program.”

The proposed legislation would ban the TSA from expanding its program and require the agency to receive congressional authorization to use the technology in the future. It would also require the TSA to dispose of the facial biometrics.

Merkley said the type of personalized, unique bio information being scooped up and stored should be off limits to any government.

“The TSA program is a precursor to a full-blown national surveillance state. Nothing could be more damaging to our national values of privacy and freedom. No government should be trusted with this power,” Merkley told The Hill.

Senators Roger Marshall (R-Kan.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Edward Markey (D-Mass.) and Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) were also co-sponsors of the legislation.

The TSA announced in May it was launching its pilot facial recognition program at 16 airports across the country, with the Atlanta, Los Angeles, Washington, D.C, and Denver airports, four of the busiest in the nation, among the 16 that agreed to trample all over people’s privacy and work with the government to test the program.

The other airports participating in this egregious pilot program are Baltimore, Boston, Dallas, Detroit, Las Vegas, Miami, Orlando, Phoenix, Salt Lake City, San Jose, and Gulfport-Biloxi and Jackson in Mississippi.

Many of the busiest airports in Europe and in Israel are also doing the face scans. Some are also scanning people’s irises.

Notice that roughly half of the U.S. airports participating are in states run by Republicans. This is just further evidence that when it comes to the surveillance state being built by globalist technocrats, Republicans are no better than Democrats.

But that’s not all. It gets worse.

The TSA announced this past summer that it had plans to expand the airport bio data collection program to 430 U.S. airports next year.

Travelers at airports with the pilot program place their driver’s license into a slot that reads the card or press their passport photo against a card reader. The travelers then look into a camera on a screen, which takes a photo of their face and compares it to their ID photo.

Once this so-called pilot program gets expanded to all airports, the government will be in possession of the complete travel history of every American who flies, both domestically and internationally. Throw in an electric vehicle, and your road travel will also be trackable in real time, but that’s another topic for another article.

The bipartisan Traveler Privacy Protection Act would prevent the TSA from using airports as a site to collect Americans’ sensitive facial biometric data by:

  • Repealing existing authorization for TSA to explore facial recognition technology and require explicit congressional authorization for future use.
  • Immediately banning the Transportation Security Administration from expanding its use of facial recognition.
  • Requiring TSA to end its facial recognition program and dispose of facial biometrics within three months.

Please call your U.S. senator and ask them to support this legislation.

LeoHohmann.com is 100 percent reader supported and not beholden to any corporate or government interests, ads or sponsorships. If you appreciate my work and would like to support it, you may send a donation of any size c/o Leo Hohmann, P.O. Box 291, Newnan, GA 30264, or via credit card below.

Published by

leohohmann

Independent author, researcher, writer.

16 thoughts on “Move afoot in Congress to ban U.S. airports from secretly scanning passengers’ faces and indefinitely storing their personal biometric data”

    1. It is almost impossible to take all money out of cr union/ bank. We are retired living off interest along w/ SS and 401k. CDs are paying good interest in credit unions now. We have some T bonds but they haven’t matured yet.

      Like

  1. This is a setup for the Mark of the Beast. I think we all know that. It will soon be everywhere. Grocery stores, banks, etc.

    Liked by 2 people

      1. Non compliance (like ones who refused covid shots) is the key. Do business with mom and pop shops and dining. We are not livestock.

        Like

  2. Anyone who believes this legislation is going anywhere raise your hand!

    Oh, no takers? Yeah that’s what I thought too . . .

    Just one more example of a dog and pony show to further the illusion that they really are concerned about our privacy. The first question in my mind is what false flag are they planning as they did in 911 as the precursor to passing the Patriot Act? The alphabet vampires will use some unforeseen event to convince Congress that they absolutely have to have this technology and processes in place to stop terrorism, when in fact they are the true terrorists.

    The optimist in me tells me I should believe them to a degree, and I truly wish I could. The realist in me says it’s nothing more than one more act in a play called The Grand Illusion!

    Liked by 3 people

  3. The problem is that technology is being used more for nefarious purposes than beneficial ones and governments are clearly on board using technology to ensure a future enslavement of all of humanity to its dictates. In fact, governments have been the funders for decades of technological devices and methods for purposes of war in particular but also to advance ways people, including their own citizens, can be monitored, tracked, sickened, and killed.

    Like

  4. If Senator Merkley is worried about “a full-blown surveillance state,” he and others like him are a bit late to the party. Edward Snowden issued that warning years ago and was hounded into exile for his trouble. Does anyone doubt that if he were to return to the States, he would be immediately hustled into black SUVs, never to be seen again?

    I doubt that any traveler feels safer upon going through an airport security check. It is performance theater on its best day and bad theater at that. A more charitable view is that the TSA serves as a jobs program for marginal people, and perhaps a few capable ones, in the ever-ballooning bureaucracy. This agency is still stuck on trying to prevent another shoe bomber attack, something I have not encountered when flying overseas.

    The question is never whether an Act of some sort passes; it’s always who provides oversight and enforcement of the prohibition. Given the state of the border, there is no reason to have confidence that airport monitors would pay heed to such legislation if it were to pass. As it is, the Air Marshal Service is now following newborns and doing waitress duty at the border instead of its actual job. And there are folks who wonder why people’s impression of govt is so low.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Those globalists, such as Schwab and Obama, simply want to deprive us of our free will through their policies. They use the education system to teach our children to compete, obey, poison the air, create the flu, and now they are beginning to deprive us of our freedom. So what we need to do now is to rely on God and counter the policies of these global elites.

      Like

    1. Wait until you are 78 and have been doing this for over forty years with reading material and now online since 2006. people Having to cut people out of my circle when I realize they will “go with the flow” and lack critical thinking skills. This happened during covid lockdowns whe vaccines were being pushed. I had to block several callers and cancelled aol. One man told me we won’t be able to trust anyone othet than likeminded when things “get worser”.. If people are “on the fence” we need to move on. Best now to home church/family church or meet with friends for fellowship and/ or on Zoom/chat room.

      Liked by 1 person

  5. Many foreign countries openly are doing this and require Q codes and digital passports. The move in congress is a distraction and the scanning will eventually be universal.

    Like

Comments are closed.