Is the government secretly acquiring and storing the blood of newborn babies in its quest to build a DNA ‘registry’?

The state of Texas was caught selling babies’ blood samples to the Pentagon while several other states have also been caught stealing and selling the DNA of newborn babies to third parties

There’s something not quite right about that little “heel-prick” test that hospitals routinely do on newborns. They say it’s to detect disease but, if that’s the case, why do some states try to keep the DNA samples taken during these procedures and store them for decades without ever telling the parents? After doing a bit of research and reading over a recently filed lawsuit, I have some information to share that presents a clearer picture as to why it’s almost impossible to get a newborn baby out of a hospital without having its little heel jabbed.

Thankfully, some parents are wising up and going on the legal offensive against the hospitals and states who are colluding in secret.

A lawsuit has been filed by the Institute for Justice over a state program in New Jersey that has been obtaining, and secretly holding onto, blood from newborn babies.

The Institute for Justice explained in a press release it is representing two sets of parents in the case.

The state claims it can use the DNA from the babies’ blood samples for any reason, without informed consent from parents.

The case charges that state law in New Jersey demands that when babies are born, blood be taken and tested for various diseases. This same demand exists in all states.

But, according to the attorneys representing the parents, what makes New Jersey different is that, “after the testing is over, New Jersey’s Department of Health keeps the leftover blood for 23 years. The state does not ask parents for their consent to keep their babies’ blood, failing to even inform parents that it will hold on to the residual blood. The only way parents could learn about such retention is by proactively looking it up on one of the third-party websites listed on the bottom of the card they’re given after the blood draw.

“And, once the state has the blood, it can use it however it wishes, including selling it to third parties, giving it to police without a warrant, or even selling it to the Pentagon to create a registry—as previously happened in Texas.” (emphasis mine)

That bit about selling DNA to the Pentagon “to create a registry” jumped out at me.

It’s a documented fact that part of United Nations Agenda 2030 is to create a birth registry for all people. Look it up.

Sustainable Development Goal 16.9 of Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development states, “Create a legal identity for all, including birth registration, by 2030,” and this “has been acknowledged as crucial for advancing the 2030 Agenda commitment to leave no one behind,” according to the website of the United Nations Development Program (UNDP). On that same web page, they state:

Article 6 of the Universal Declaration on Human Rights states that everybody has the right to a legal identity. Sustainable Development Goal Target 16.9 (“legal identity for all, including birth registration, by 2030”) has been acknowledged as crucial for advancing the 2030 Agenda commitment to leave no one behind. However, hundreds of millions of people still lack proper identification, and about half of the world’s countries do not have a universal system for registering births and deaths.

The United Nations Legal Identity Agenda Task Force, co-chaired by UNDP, UNDESA, and UNICEF, is working with Member States to ensure that more than 300 million people acquire a legal identity by 2025.  UNDP is strengthening the capacity of Member States to develop holistic, country-owned, sustainable and interoperable civil registration, vital statistics and identity management systems. UNDP  is working to increase the number of countries that address legal identity issues as a foundational pillar of national development plans and strategies and ensure that everyone, without exception, has access to essential public goods and services.

The UNDP site then steers those wanting more information “On UNDP’s work in this important area,” to visit the following websites:

So, with just a little researching we find that this drive to scoop up DNA from newborns is tied to creating a global ID system, and a global digital ID at that.

It’s highly likely that the overarching reason this DNA is being taken and secretly stored has little or nothing to do with fighting disease and everything to do with fulfilling the U.N. mandate for all nations to create a unique biometric identifier on every person, which then can be digitized and filed away for future use in a fully digitized society. With every newborn having a DNA sample already on file with the government, think how easy it would be to create a biometric digital ID for all humans, in full compliance with U.N. Agenda 2030 and a future global government.

If New Jersey has a program to turn over DNA to the federal government, you can bet it’s happening in other states as well. We just haven’t found out about it yet. And why would the U.S. Department of Defense, of all agencies, want to get its hands on this DNA from every newborn baby?

In fact, the New Jersey legal team said similar lawsuits already have been brought against Texas, Minnesota and Michigan, and in those cases settlements have ordered the destruction of blood samples held by the states, or the state has voluntarily destroyed them. California is also collecting and storing the DNA of infants without parental consent.

The New Jersey Monitor reports that more than 100,000 babies are born each year in New Jersey, meaning the state has stockpiled millions of blood spots from its decades-old newborn screening program. Yet, a handout given to new parents fails to disclose that the state stores the samples for 23 years, nor does it explain why.

Rob Frommer, a senior lawyer for the Institute for Justice, stated:

“Parents have a right to informed consent if the state wants to keep their children’s blood for decades and use it for purposes other than screening for diseases. New Jersey’s policy of storing baby blood and DNA and using that genetic information however it wants is a clear violation of the Fourth Amendment rights of all New Jersey parents and their newborns.”

The plaintiffs are two Boonton, N.J., parents, Erica and Jeremiah Jedynak, and the Rev. Hannah Lovaglio, a mother of two sons in Cranbury, N.J.

Patrick Wood, editor in chieef of Technocracy.News, says the hospital industry has a history of selling our personal data to the highest bidder.

Wood stated in response to my research:

“The hospital industry has largely been taken over by Technocrats who practice ‘evidence-based medicine.’ You see the Technocrat mind at work when it selectively collects certain data while ignoring other data. Thus, collecting DNA from newborns for sequencing and permanent storage should be seen as a prime directive for Technocrats. Why? Because this is foundational for the soon-and-coming global digital system that will control all humans on Earth.”

Wood said this propensity of the medical industry toward technocratic chicanery is seen all over the professional literature.

“The Holy Grail of a digital ID system is DNA,” he said.

For instance, Biometric Update wrote in July,

Biometric identification solutions have become firmly established in our everyday lives, whether at security checks at airports or through facial recognition on smartphones – and the next generation is already waiting. DNA-based processes not only ensure precise identification of individuals but also raise data protection to a completely new level.

In addition to common biometric methods such as fingerprints, iris scans or facial recognition, DNA ID heralds the coming evolutionary step in personal identification and verification. The groundbreaking results of rapid DNA technologies will inexorably increase their acceptance, and it is foreseeable that the technology will find its way into further areas of life. In the future, citizens and governments will benefit equally from the advantages of fast and reliable DNA-based personal identification.

So, Wood asks, should we dismiss the collecting of newborn blood to harvest DNA for ulterior purposes?

One final tell that the technocrat mindset is at work is the fact they have hidden this practice right under our nose. That is, until a few parents stumbled across it and blew the whistle. 

LeoHohmann.com needs your help: I am 100 percent independent, meaning I’m not beholden to any corporate or government advertisers, sponsorships or grants. If you appreciate my work and would like to support it, you may send a donation of any size c/o Leo Hohmann, P.O. Box 291, Newnan, GA 30264, or via credit card below. Thank you to all those who have supported me to date!

Published by

Unknown's avatar

leohohmann

Independent author, researcher, writer.

26 thoughts on “Is the government secretly acquiring and storing the blood of newborn babies in its quest to build a DNA ‘registry’?”

  1. Pingback: USA: Vláda zřejmě tajně uchovává krev novorozenců, aby vytvořila budoucí registr DNA - volnyblog

  3. Many states use the concept of informed dissent. The parent could refuse to have the sample drawn but if they did not refuse then the state would test for what ever they deemed was needed now and in the future. Newborn screening panels were and are always are changing. The original tests, PKU is a disorder along with the other original tests a for causes mental retardation and life long institutionalization. A penny spent on testing for a life time of money saved. Look up the name Robert Guthrie, great Dr. from NY. Had the chance on several occasions to talk with him, nice man.

    Like

    1. Newborn blood has been harvested and registered since Rockefeller took over the medical system for the purpose of targeting those with high VMAT-2 and SLC-18 gene blood. Certain traits are identified which they wish to eliminate based on the newborn’s genetics. It is a Holy War.

      Like

  4. I have been retired from my state job for 4 years and away from my supervisor position in the newborn screening section for over 10 years (good 15 years total). But while I was in charge of the section, the powers above were having us store the samples with idea that future PCR technologies would allow testing for “anything”. I would interface with other states that were doing the same. BTW I pulled my own children’s bloodspots from that collection.

    Like

  5. I have been retired from my state job for 4 years and away from my supervisor position in the newborn screening section for over 10 years (good 15 years total). But while I was in charge of the section, the powers above were having us store the samples with idea that future PCR technologies would allow testing for “anything”. I would interface with other states that were doing the same. BTW I pulled my own children’s bloodspots from that collection.

    Liked by 2 people

      1. Actually, right after I posted this, I remember its been even longer than I mentioned. The one bloodspots we took was only the size of a dime and a 1/8 inch thick and could be stored 100k per box. Wouldn’t take much room. The military has a very extensive facility to store samples on all personal forever. Once in the military, ya have no rights for the most part.

        Liked by 1 person

  6. “everybody has the right to a legal identity.” While this is true, a right exists because the person does, not because some outside agency stepped in. One’s identity is not consigned to the presence of a state-issued ID or other document. The idea that the UN or other agency can grant people rights is absurd. That’s not how rights work; it’s how privileges work, and a privilege that is granted is also one that can be revoked.

    I have no idea if the blood is used for noble or nefarious purposes, but the more I learn about various groups and see them in action, the more inclined I am to NOT give them the benefit of the doubt. They have forfeited that benefit through their own behavior. It’s not hard at all to imagine some bureaucracy wanting a registry, a massive database with people’s information. It’s even harder to imagine anything good coming of this practice.

    Liked by 1 person

  7. Who said, “The world is growing gloriously dark” ? What some of us would not have even thought possible 20 – 25 years ago, is now pointing the way for Globalism in all its “DEMONIC GLORY” = digital ID, blockchain, worldwide digital currency….. i.e., CONTROL CONTROL, CONTROL.

    Liked by 1 person

  8. In the Netherlands the health minions , whether it be nurses or physicians, take blood-sample from every new-born baby by means of a ‘heel-prick’ and they say it is to track down possible diseases,
    This heel-prick is usually done within 3 days after birth.
    On a side-note: in the Netherlands people are generally very docile, believing ‘the government and (health) authorities only have the people’s best interest at heart’. In reality all kinds of government abuses of power are swept and kept under the rug.
    Take for example the Midazolam murders which were being committed on a massive scale in British hospitals during the past covid plandemic. All according to official government ‘health care’ protocols, using 2 drugs (Midazolam and morphine) out of the 3 drugs that are being used in some American states when a person is convicted to the penalty of death.
    In Germany a similiar murder scenario is surfacing through several independent news sources.
    Yet, in the Netherlands these ‘inconvenient truths’ are kept carefully under the BIG rug. The corrupt Dutch WEF-owned cabinet will not even debate the significant excess mortality deaths over the past three years AFTER the roll out of the state injectables!
    The Netherlands is a cesspool of corruption!

    Liked by 1 person

  9. Brother Wally who has a YouTube channel Revelations of Jesus Christ covered the spiritual aspect of this practice a few months ago. Whichever way you look at it whether material or spiritual it is shocking.

    Liked by 1 person

  10. However, the current situation is indeed very bad. I fully understand your feelings and your inner selves.

    Like

  11. Friends, we should be happy because everything is coming to an end. Don’t we? It’s the middle of a seven year disaster, and in a few years, this world will come to an end. When this world ends, it will be the millennium and the new heaven and earth. From then on, there will be no authoritarian, corrupt, or corrupt governments, no moral corruption, no injustice, no exam oriented education, 996 working hours, and mental control. All that exists is peace and justice We will always be with the Lord Jesus, isn’t it worth our joy.

    Like

    1. hi2584733592020:

      I totally agree. Let it all end and begin again. At one point in life I was afraid of dying. Now I am afraid of living.

      Liked by 2 people

  13. It would seem to me, considering the other goal of “reduced population” and the (so-called) “wonders” of messenger RNA, perhaps having the DNA codes of vast portions of the population has another “useful” (translate: evil) purpose we’re not quite seeing just yet. Pretty sure I read from Patrick Wood that messenger RNA can be used to target parts of DNA code (based on, maybe, family name, heritage, or ancestry). Maybe they’ll use all that DNA information to target specific people or people groups?
    Nah– they wouldn’t do that– “they’re from the gubb’ment, and they’re here to help.”

    Liked by 2 people

  14. Hello!

    This is horrific and needs to be stopped ASAP. I’m going to share a story with you that has always greatly concerned me since the birth of my child in 1997. I live in Washington state. I had a normal birth at our local hospital. They did all the “normal testing, cognitive, blood samples, etc…” and we left the hospital to begin our lives together the next day.

    Speed up to roughly five years later, I get a phone call from the State of Washington. If memory serves, it was from the health department. They stated that they were calling to request verbal authorization to use my child’s umbilical cord blood for stem cell research. I got very upset and asked how they obtained this blood without my authorization. I was told that I signed off on it the day we were leaving the hospital. I stated that I must have signed it without reading the document fully, because I would never sign such a document had i known their intent. I further stated that no, I would not authorize use of the cord blood and I requested they destroy any samples they had on my child.
    The woman on the phone then began to try to guilt me into authorization. I again stated my firm No. Because I was much younger then and didn’t follow up, I have no idea how this turned out.

    My reason for sharing this story is to offer my experience as proof that hospitals are doing this, clear back to 1997. They are not forthcoming about what they are doing with the blood, or who they are sharing this blood with. We are in imminent danger of losing all our freedoms, privacy, and literally our own DNA to governments and unelected world powers. IT MUST STOP!!!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. To Erika, good you are suspicious! When I turned 50 and enticed by a TV ad to be a “helpful neighbor” I began donating ny blood to the local center. I knew my blood type was not the most plentiful and I’m almost pure blood, only one vax in my life 40 years ago. I am free of the usual age-related issues, very healthy. The donation center was always prompt to call with an appointment reminder. Then I began to read. I learned that my blood was used in vaccine research. I don’t approve and cancelled future donations, learning it was impossible to request other usages for my blood. The “damage” was done. I and my three children have unwittingly given our DNA to the government. It will get no more.

      Like

      1. Wow! I’m sorry this happened to you. It’s concerning to learn how entities we have trusted in the past and made personal decisions to help, can utilize our personal data at will for whatever the heck they want. We sign blanket authorizations all in the name of trying to be good citizens. I guess the moral of all of this is never give freedoms away. How sad for humanity that we’ve reached the point where you cannot trust. We are truly doomed as a human race when it come to world agendas.

        Liked by 1 person

  15. Getting more and more convinced that America has been completely taken over by global communist technocracy where everyone is tracked and they have complete profile records on every citizen from birth to death.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. I really do not think we are into Tribulation yet. It is going to get a lot worse, and I do believe we will be harpozoed (sp), raptured, caught up as the apostles explained, and as John wrote in detail about during his Patmos exile.

      Like

  16. I remember walking into an HSBC Bank Canada branch in Vancouver British Columbia in 2015 and I saw a strange sign that said YOUR DNA IS YOUR DATA.

    It’s obvious they’ve been planning this a very long time.

    Liked by 2 people

  18. They make it sound so good that its for the “good” of the people.
    And 80% of the people believe it because they dont understand,
    or dont want to understand the ‘big picture’.
    I though i read somewhere that babies are already being chipped
    without anyone knowing about it. Maybe that was some other
    country? Or maybe that was still in the conspiracy stage or phase.

    Liked by 1 person

  19. Yes! Here in MN Twila Brase has been fighting against this since the 80’s. She is with Citizens’ Council for Health Freedom.
    I came across her after COVID shook the world. I attended her fundraiser last year.
    They have been collecting baby DNA for years!
    Horrific!
    Long Live We the People!
    Stand up everyone!

    Liked by 1 person

Comments are closed.