It’s the day after and we are still trying to make sense of it all.
Why was a 31-year-old conservative activist gunned down in broad daylight while doing what he does best, speaking to college students about the evils of this world and giving advice on how to counter it?
Why was he murdered, by who, and what should be the lesson to the rest of us who are like-minded and share his values?
As for the who, we may never know. They will tell us it was a college-aged trans activist, but I have a hard time believing that, given the professional skills the killer displayed under very challenging conditions.
Charlie made no secret of the fact that he received death threats “daily.”
Watch the video below, from September 2023, almost two years ago to the day, where Charlie described what it’s like to have a huge audience and speaking truths the establishment wants to muzzle.
In the above video, it was about the Russia-Ukraine war and Charlie’s steadfast opposition to U.S. involvement that infuriated his enemies. Charlie said the most rabid Zelensky fans made it clear they wanted to see him get his “head blown off” if Charlie didn’t stop telling his audience that America needed to stop funding Ukraine’s war effort against Russia.
Now that Charlie did meet that horrible fate, how should we respond?
I’ve heard some in the conservative movement say they’re tired of the left’s vicious tactics and it’s time to rise up. There’s nothing wrong with that, until you ask some of them what that means in their minds. Some say it’s time to take up arms against the evil ones on the left.
Charlie’s assassination and the way it was carried out checks many boxes for the narrative the globalists want us to buy into.
The script for their narrative goes something like this: Charlie Kirk was a big voice on the right. He was killed by someone on the left. The left celebrates his death. The right gets further inflamed and enraged, striking back in a torrent of violence against the left. The left reacts with more targeted killings of voices on the right. Civil war ensues.
The globalists may also be using this horrific act, not only to further divide, but to send a message to those on the right who speak truth to power and have an audience, no matter how small:
Better watch your words, because we’re watching you. If we can slay the mighty giant Charlie Kirk, with all the security he could afford to encircle himself with, we can certainly take out you little people.
I am not a pacifist and would not just reflexively rule out that things could come to a point where we need to take up arms to defend ourselves. Taking up arms in a defensive posture is definitely a biblical concept. But never for offensive purposes. Even preemptive violence is unbiblical in my opinion. If we get word that a known enemy of ours is planning to take us out, do we go and take that enemy out first? I don’t think so. I can’t imagine Jesus doing that or telling his apostles to go take out a platoon of Romans when they least expect it because, hey, the Romans hate you and are coming for you.
And I don’t think that’s what Charlie would want. They considered him a threat because he used his talents to peacefully spread the truth, the truth about the world today and the truth about our answer to the evil. It’s the gospel of Jesus Christ. Satan hates that.
Charlie once said:
“When people stop talking, you get violence. That’s when civil war happens. Because you start to think that the other side is so evil, and they lose their humanity.”
Charlie understood that the essence of the battle we fight is not against flesh and blood but against evil spirits in high places.
When asked how he would want to be remembered, Charlie said he wanted to be remembered for his faith, not for any of his political advocacy, not for his amazing debating skills or organizational talents. He yearned for a spiritual revival in the very young people he debated and mentored.
Some on the right will attempt to use Charlie’s death as a call to hate. Charlie would want it to be the catalyst for a call to faith.
Ironically, Charlie’s death could be the trigger that was needed to spark a revival of Christian faith among young Americans. It could be the trigger for revival or it could be the trigger for an even more violent future in this country. The forces of good are praying for the former; the forces of evil are working feverishly for the latter.
Charlie Kirk was an American patriot but, more importantly, he was a Christian martyr. We are entering the last of the last days, a time when there will be many more Charlie Kirks.
As an independent journalist specializing in globalism, religion, technocracy and world affairs, Leo Hohmann depends solely his readers for support. He gets no government handouts, corporate ads or sponsorships. If you appreciate these updates and wish to support the site, you may send a donation of any size c/o Leo Hohmann, PO Box 291, Newnan, GA 30264, or donate via credit card below.
LeoHohmann.com 
I believe Charlie is a strong Christian man who walked in the truth of God’s word, and was guided by the power of God’s word to combat the evil and wicked world we all live in, however I will leave the title of Martyr up to God, as his primary focus was on calling out the leftist liberal stupidity and evil.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I don’t believe Tyler Robinson is the killer.
The weapon which they claim to be the murder weapon is a Mauser Model 98 rifle which is a bolt action weapon over 43inches long. It’s far to long to fit in a standard backpack without being disassembled.
But I think the cops found a fully assembled Mauser Model 98 rifle which the man on the roof was not seen to have as he got down from the roof. All he had was his bag.
I think that the man on the roof was a spotter who was part of a highly trained group of assassins who carried out the murder of Charlie Kirk. Either that or else he had a top range weapon which could be disassembled very quickly and put into the rooftop man’s bag.
🧍♂️” Doppelgänger claim: Tyler Robinson reportedly told friends in Discord chats that the person seen on the rooftop surveillance footage was “just a doppelgänger,” not him. While some dismissed this as sarcasm or deflection, others argue it could be a genuine claim—especially since the footage doesn’t show a clear face, and Robinson has refused to cooperate with investigators.”
I’ll finish by saying that Tyler has not confessed to committing this murder.
He probably went to the police clarify that it wasn’t him and then got detained.
They have not established ownership of the weapon.
They needed a quick arrest and so they detained Tyler
The inscriptions on the bullets were probably designed to create a lynch mob mentality among the liberals and to shift focus away from the true agenda.
So, these are just my thoughts based on my understanding of the unfolding of events.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Unibokk—I think you are right about the murder weapon. When the “suspect” Robinson fled by jumping off the roof, he did not have the rifle on him. After taking the shot, there is no way he could have disassembled the Mauser rifle, packed it in his backpack and run within 2 minutes (the time of the video that shows his jumping from the roof. The rifle found in the woods was obviously planted there. It would seem to me that Robinson is a patsy.
I saw in today’s article on the Unz Review by Laurent Guyenot “Who Killed Charlie Kirk? The Case against Israel” a short video of someone who did a ballistics study to determine where the bullet came from. There were at least 4 cameras aimed at where Kirk was sitting. Going frame by frame, just at the moment he was hit, his right ear plug flew out, jerking up on a small microphone or device that was pinned to the right side of his T-shirt. Then the next moment, blood appears at his lower left neck and he falls over to the left, as if pushed. The person doing the study said that apparently the entrance wound was located near his right ear at the jawline and exited out the lower left neck. The shot, at that angle, most likely cut his brain stem as well as cutting the cartoid artery, so he may have been dead before he hit the ground. If this is correct, then the shot came from Kirk’s upper right and NOT from the front, where the patsy was seen prone on the roof. If Kirk had been hit from the front with a high-powered rifle round (supposedly a 30.06), he would have been knocked over backward, not to the side. But we would need to see an autopsy to be certain. Hope they don’t sabotage that as was done to JFK.
There was a similar switch of rifles that happened at the JFK assassination. The first rifle that was found in the Texas Depository Book Building was a 7.65 Mauser (there is film showing it to be identified as a 765 Mauser), but on the 6th story window sill was found 3 shells for a 6.5 rifle (later said to be from the Mannlicher-Carcano rifle that was officially designated as the murder weapon). Obviously 6.5 bullets cannot be fired from the Mauser. The Mauser almost immediately disappeared and the deputy, Roger Craig, who hounded investigators and testified at the Warren Commission about the Mauser later lost his job. There had been several murder attempts on Craig’s life before he was finally killed in 1975, after being “suicided”.
Kirk’s security was supplied by a Zionist organization and Ben Shapiro recently said that his security team had been in contact with Kirk’s that day. It was strange that the rooftops had not been cleared by the security team.
Another oddity, Internet personality Stew Peters showed that the Jerusalem Post was the very first news service to announce Kirk’s death, according to timestamp comparisons of news outlets of the announcement. This can be verified. Also, it was odd that Trump was the first in the US to announce Kirk’s death. I looked for verification at all the major news services and none of them announced this until almost 10 minutes later.
Another oddity, almost immediately after the shooting, members of Congress besieged the Sergeant-at-Arms for security protection. Why? Kirk was not a politician, just a youth activist. The shooting occurred almost 1500 miles away. Why the panic? Could it be that since nearly all members of Congress take money from AIPAC, just as Kirk’s TPUSA was heavily funded by Zionists, that now they aren’t sure of safety if they say anything that could be vaguely construed as off script?
It has been pointed out in numerous places that this murder was deliberately done at a well-attended public event and was meant to be a horrible spectacle to send a strong message. A spectacle like JFK, just like RFK and MLK. Just shows how infested our whole system is by a very dark evil force that’s been with us for decades.
LikeLike
Great detective work Kayjae
I think the man on the roof was a spotter. He was of a slimmer build when compared to Tyler Robinson and he had a different posture, in my opinion.
“Without a spotter, a marksman is essentially flying solo—limited by their scope, unable to track bullet impacts, and more vulnerable to mistakes. The spotter turns a good shot into a surgical strike.”
The spotter plays a very big part. He does lots of calculations such as checking wind speed and direction , he checks the exact distance to the target etc. So, the marksman just follows instructions and then takes the shot without any unnecessary distractions.
I believe that this was a very important hit for the reasons you’ve stated, so they would have left nothing to chance.
I reckon that the blood pouring out from the left side of his neck is because the exit hole of a bullet is much larger than the entry hole. So, this would add more confirmation to the view that he was shot from the his right hand side.
It’s a long time since I’ve watched Stew Peters, I must check out his channel.
Thanks for the info.
LikeLike
The FBI announced today that they caught a likely “suspect”, a 22 year old Utah man, who was supposedly turned into the police by his father. It’s the usual lone nut case, this time of a kid who is said to have recently turned leftie. Trump says he hopes the suspect gets executed. (He should keep his mouth shut and quit prejudicing this case.)
Is this another patsy? Can we expect son of Jack Ruby to pay him a visit? Just like the would-be assassin of Trump in Pennsylvania—an investigation that went nowhere, revealed nothing. That “lone nut” was taken out and then cremated. Case closed up tight. We won’t know what really happened there for 60 years—which seems to be SOP.
On the Right, among well-known Right-wing celebrities, some politicians, even some Christians, there is a deafening call for revenge upon the Left. On the Left—even before Kirk died of his wound—too many celebrated the death of Kirk, which of course, enrages those on the Right. How idiotic—even a Houthi leader decried this assassination–so why have leftist/liberal Americans vented so much hate-filled glee over this assassination? How depraved!
All of this polarizes us even more. There is no more coming together on anything, just more violent splitting apart. Civil War cannot be far off, and for those who are spoiling for one—just know that civil wars are the most deadly of wars and often last for generations. That will turn us into a 3rd world nation and there will be scant chance this time we could rise like a phoenix out of those ashes. Something evil wants self-destruction to be our destiny. The spirit of our times is criminality, hate and revenge, but true Christians ought not to comply with that spirit. But do we have it in us to rise above these times and show the right way?? Or will we further retreat?
LikeLike
One shot and then the assassin blends into the crowd. Looks like a professional carried out this murder. I suspect that the assassin is a Mossad hitman.
I watched some video footage of Charly speaking about his faith and was impressed with his testimony for Christ.
His death is a true loss to the American people and especially his loving family. R.I.P. Charlie.
LikeLike
Disclaimer.
when I made my previous comment I did not know that Charlie Kirk was a devout ‘Christian Zionist’ who actually supported Israel and it’s genocide of the Palestinian people. It seems that he was just another right winger who politicised Christianity. But I don’t condone his murder.
LikeLike
Unibokk– There is an explosive article (dated 9/12/2025) on “The Grayzone” by investigative journalist Max Blumenthal and Anya Parampil titled “Charlie Kirk refused Netanyahu funding offer, was ‘frightened’ by pro-Israel forces before death, friend reveals”. I would post the link here but I can’t post links here on this site. But it is easily found online.
It has a lot of details about how, in the last 6 months of Kirk’s life, he began to shift away from the approved Zionist narrative, even hosting a debate between anti-Zionist Dave Smith and pro-Zionist Jose Hammer on July 13. Dave Smith easily won the debate and the majority of conservative youth audience sided with him. This is something Zionism USA cannot tolerate, evidenced by how they, through Trump edicts, have forced the arrest of foreign students and ended free speech at universities. They and other Israel-first donors had heavily funded Kirk’s Turning Point movement and they expected him to toe their line. That Kirk, as head of the conservative youth, should turn against the Zionist narrative angered his Zionist donors. So was this was yet another “decapitation strike” of a leader that Israel is so adept at globally? Now rabid Zionist Ben Shapiro is trying to step into Kirk’s role. If he does, then the more conciliatory tone of Kirk’s conservative youth movement will instead become more extreme to force conservative youth to support Zionism, this time without question. The Grayzone article is highly interesting and well-researched, I encourage anyone to read it.
That all said–We do not yet know definitely who did the shooting and whether or not some bigger force was behind it and what the motivation was. But evidently some within the Trump camp believe Mossad had something to do with it. In any case, this incident has caused the rift between Left and Right to widen further and become more violently angry. Trump is using this incident to strike harder at the Left, so he says. Back in the turbulent 60s and early 70s, there was a similar violent atmosphere, but at least then there was a general consensus that Americans should preserve Constitutional rights, lawfulness and our culture. When our involvement in Vietnam end in 1973, everything went suddenly back to normal and it was relatively peaceful for a time. (Although the radical Left and the Neocons remained at work behind the scenes undermining the country for the next 60 years.) Now there is no consensus on anything; both sides seem willing to tear the country apart at any cost to get at each other. When I read some online comments, it’s alarming how extremely vicious both sides are now. A new Dark Age coming?
LikeLiked by 3 people
Kayjae is right. The US atmosphere right now is very much a powder keg. I expect more targeted killings by the left until they get the right to respond in kind. Whether that will take one more high-profile conservative to be struck down or five more I have no idea but this is what the globalists who control both sides are seriously striving for. If you recall the Obama-funded movie from two years ago, “Leave the World Behind,” one of the characters said “they need us to start killing each other.” This was the globalists telegraphing their plans for America. The Kirk assassination was a major advancement of that plan, and I’m afraid it has unleashed an extended period of bloodletting. I pray I am wrong but this is what I feel. Dark times, for sure.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Kayjae , for the clarification.
In my first comment I believed that Kirk was moving away from allegiance with the Zionists. But I decided to check further before making my second comment and I could not find confirmation of what I believed.
In light of what you have said I resume my belief that it was Mossad who carried out the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
Netanyahu relies heavily on the support of the American evangelical church who in turn form a large block of support for Netanyahu’s agenda.
Netanyahu does not want somebody like Kirk to come along and compromise that support.
With regard to Trump, I would describe him as the president of Polarity. He is always playing one group against another. He is the type of character who could start a civil war.
I have said repeatedly that Trump will bring America to it’s knees. He’s like a bull in a China shop and I believe that the Zionists will make full use of Trump’s madness.
LikeLike
I totally agree with this statement:
“With regard to Trump, I would describe him as the president of Polarity. He is always playing one group against another. He is the type of character who could start a civil war.”
I would even add a word, PERFECT. Trump is the perfect president, especially coming on the heels of a similarly divisive left-wing president like Biden, to help the globalists realize their dream of igniting a second American civil war.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Dark times, for sure.“
Hello Leo ,
Yep, I’m 67 years old and I’ve never before witnessed such a sense of darkness across the world.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I understand that Christianity became more important to Kirk as he grew older, and his way of engaging his opponents was Christian-like, but to call him a Christian martyr I think is an overreach. He wasn’t killed for his Christian testimony, but rather for his political opposition to the war in Ukraine and his questioning of Israel’s October 7 narrative. He was well aware that he was on the Ukrainian kill list for opposing US involvement and Zelensky in that war—that was a threat to his political stance, not a religious one. His questioning of the usual Israeli narrative about October 7 began to trouble his Israel-First donors. Unfortunately, both are fascist regimes the US government supports that he, as a public figure, sadly tangled with. It seems that as he was maturing as a political figure, his ideas were beginning to evolve away from ideologies and towards truth, and that political evolution could well have an effect on the young folks he was influencing. Who knows where his questioning of the narratives would have led him 5 or 10 years from now.
By saying he is more of a political martyr than a Christian one is not to detract from him. After all, Dag Hammarskjold, JFK, RFK, MLK and Malcolm X were all evolving in their political understanding towards the truth and trying to act upon that truth. The truth was to work for peace and freedom and to oppose those forces and ideologies that first divide, then force people into abject submission to evil forces. This work was a moral mission as both JFK and RFK stated. So Kirk could be said to be increasingly evolving into this same high-minded political understanding, which sought truth and peace above ideology and geopolitical machinations. Some enemy, though, detected this change and began to target Kirk. Kirk may be said to share with other historical figures that kind of martyrdom. Because this battle is all about maintaining “narratives” vs seeking truth. It’s a vicious war and Kirk was one of its casualties. And like nearly all American assassinations, we may never learn the true motives of these killings because of all the cover-ups sure to come. And it looks like there could be more martyrdoms of this sort in future.
If there is a Christian element to this martyrdom, it would be this—it would be for political figures, such as Kirk, to resolutely pursue truth, morality, dignity, freedom and justice for all humanity. These are still revolutionary concepts–shining lights in Western civilization. This ethos is something the pagan world never understood and opposed, and today’s criminals infesting governments, institutions and our elites continually and violently reject.
LikeLike
I would love for you to write a article on the bible perspective of self defence. This is still a battle in my mind……the rights and wrong of defending our homes a family.
Clayton
LikeLike
Leo, what a very well thought out and written article. I am glad you pointed out the difference between pacifism and aggression. The defensive ground is the Just one. The world has already found to many reasons to hate. Many have forgotten the principles behind a good debate. A good debate is a great learning tool that can bring clarity and understanding. Of course, those with closed minds and hands cupped over ears might as well drive a car without lights. We all have history and experiences that shape us. We are not carbon copies. That is why we have so many opinions and views. What I think today, may change tomorrow. Comes with an open mind and growth. I constantly reevaluate myself so adjust fruitful thought over emotional reaction. If I choose hate as my “go to” tool, then no matter how much I am in agreement with someone today, tomorrow I may not be. Keep the hate tool locked up, it only resorts to dehumanization and the use of violence. Charlie was definitely a victim to that kind of hate, and if it continues, the world will spiral down that path until we finally annihilate human kind. The first commenter after your post is a great example of that. The writing style alone is a window into that persons soul. We must follow Charlie Kirk’s example and not be dragged down the path of hate. Your article was one that presents a glimpse of his legacy, and encourages us to be ever watchful without the use of hate and violence. I pray we will never have to take up arms against our fellow countrymen, like the civil war era, and that humanity will learn. I know that is a heavy prayer to lift up, and it will take all of us lifting that prayer together to succeed.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I still have my thick copy of “Foxe’s Book of Martyrs”, which I have read cover-to-cover (several years ago). Should I believe that “things have gotten better” ? Then and now : will some influential people “spin” the killing of a Christian Martyr and try to “bathe” it in politics ?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for including that quote from Charlie – his words ring very true. I have no doubt that this was a professional hit. Soon, a ‘patsy’ will be delivered, but will the real culprits behind it ever be brought to justice? Probably not in this world, but surely in the next.
LikeLike
This could have been prevented with just a few surveillance drones in the air. There was video of a person (in black) on a rooftop prior to the start of the event; the event could have been delayed until this possible threat was cleared or determined to be a non-threat! See something, say something? Maybe an indoor venue only? God’s love or not, that hateful, violent element will always be with us and we must always be prepared for evil to emerge. Apparently, we haven’t learned anything from the Butler, PA attempt on Trump’s life!
LikeLike
Hi Leo, Well said about Charlie…and I agree with what’s being said and that it was also a political assassination. And I thank God sent us a reminder for us to pray for our people in leadership positions. From local levels to state levels, these are key roles for the future of US. I pray that God raises up a million more voices like Charlie just to piss off the devil! And l pray that He serves justice swiftly, because he is the God of Justice. Keep speaking Leo, yours is another voice that still needs to be heard too!! Prayers 🙏 for Charlie’s wife, his kids, his family and friends and the rest of us who admired his determination and his love for Jesus. He will be sorely missed. Blessings, ln His service
Fredericka Allen ✝️✡️🇮🇱🇺🇲❤️🕊️💜
WE SPEAK PEACE OVER ISRAEL!
ISRAEL IS FOREVER!!
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
LikeLiked by 1 person