Let’s take a look at the state of freedom in the United Kingdom in the wake of the arrest of British patriot Tommy Robinson. The below article by Edward Cline explains how the UK has clearly decided to throw out its own historic commitment to equal justice under the rule of law, and in doing so has crossed the threshold from a once-great democracy to an Orwellian police state whose leaders bow to Islam at every turn. Keep in mind that Britain first relinquished its Christian heritage before it embraced Islam.
Magna Carta In the Dustbin
By EDWARD CLINE at RuleofReason.com
Prime Minister Theresa May has said “phooey” on the Magna Carta and British liberties and ordered the arrest of Tommy Robinson on a specious charge of “disturbing the peace.” He was live-streaming a report on the trial of a group of Muslim “groomer” rapists outside a Leeds courthouse, out of earshot of the judge, the defendants, lawyers and jurors – technically not even on the courthouse property – when a bevy of policemen swooped in and arrested him.
Mark Steyn writes:
On Friday, Robinson was live-streaming (from his telephone) outside Leeds Crown Court where last week’s Grooming Gang of the Week were on trial for “grooming” — the useless euphemism for industrial-scale child gang-rape and sex slavery by large numbers of Muslim men with the active connivance of every organ of the state: social workers, police, politicians. Oh, and also the media….
Tommy Robinson, a journalist for Rebel Media, was arrested, detained, taken to another courthouse, judged, sentenced, and taken to Hull Prison, all within a matter of minutes. Not only that, but the judge who sentenced him to 13 months in prison, decreed a blanket news blackout on his arrest and also on the trial of the grooming gang. Newspapers and their Internet sites that had reported the body-snatching were obliged to “scrub” their stories, under penalty of law if they did not.
For more on Robinson’s actual arrest, read this eyewitness account.
Robinson was taken with the government\judicial tool of a “bill of attainder,” which one legal site site defines as: A legislative act that singles out an individual or group for punishment without a trial.
The Free Legal Dictionary notes:
A special legislative enactment that imposes a death sentence without a judicial trial upon a particular person or class of persons suspected of committing serious offenses, such as Treason or a felony.
A bill of attainder is prohibited by Article I, Section 9, Clause 3 of the U.S. Constitution because it deprives the person or persons singled out for punishment of the safeguards of a trial by jury.
A bill of attainder does not necessarily entail a death sentence. In Robinson’s case, it just means “disappearing” from public sight, as dissidents did in Argentina and Chile in the last century.
So on Friday he was outside the Crown Court in Leeds. He was not demonstrating, or accosting or chanting, or much speaking. He was just pointing his mobile phone upon the scene from a distance. Within minutes, seven coppers showed up in whatever they use instead of a Black Maria these days, tossed him inside it and drove off. In other words, these were not “investigating officers” called to the scene: They showed up with the intent to take him away. Within hours, he was tried, convicted and gaoled – at HM Prison Hull, a Category B chokey, or one level below maximum security. The judge in the case, one Geoffrey Marson, spent all of four minutes on trying, convicting and sentencing Robinson. It is not clear whether that leisurely tribunal included his order expressly forbidding “any report on these proceedings” (the case is Regina vs Yaxley-Lennon because that’s Robinson’s real name).
Robinson’s “trial” was more like a military “drum head” trial than a civilian trial.
Frankly, the prohibition of all news about his arrest does not even constitute a “D-notice,” but rather a plain case of classic railroading to get rid of someone likely to shed light on the 40 years of Muslim grooming and the Sharia enslaving of British girls and children in a vast prostitution ring about which the government had done little or nothing.
This is why Britain needs a Constitution like our own, complete with a First Amendment and with a prohibition of bills of attainder. Robinson was initially charged with “disturbing the peace.” However, the street on which Robinson was pacing outside the courthouse was virtually empty; it was indeed, empty and peaceful, until the cops showed up. No noisy mob of Muslims was there demonstrating and threatening to kill or injure him or any passersby. There weren’t even any supporters cheering him on.
What part of the Magna Carta does Theresa May snort at while clutching to power as she sells out Britain and Brexit? There are two clauses in it which May has put in her personal memory hole:
- (38) In future no official shall place a man on trial upon his own unsupported statement, without producing credible witnesses to the truth of it.
- (39) No free man shall be seized or imprisoned, or stripped of his rights or possessions, or outlawed or exiled, or deprived of his standing in any way, nor will we proceed with force against him, or send others to do so, except by the lawful judgment of his equals or by the law of the land.
This is not what Robinson was afforded.
READ THE ENTIRE ARTICLE HERE.
13 thoughts on “The disappearance of Tommy Robinson: What his arrest tells us about UK’s slide toward totalitarianism”
Where’s Cromwell when he’s needed?
LikeLiked by 1 person
If the Queen has any power at all in England she better wake up and use it. Now they are talking of forcing her to convert or abdicate.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve started a Change.org petition:
It’s a long shot, but worth it.
Ignore that one – no show.
Reblogged this on J-M's History Corner and commented:
So, they want to ban all reporting on this… so I’ll report on it, and you should, too!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Absolutely disgusting! They want to ban all reporting on it, eh? Then, I’ll report on it! And NOBODY is going to stop me!
It’s terrible! Trying to cover up how bad the Muslims really are because the media has been trying to portray them as nice! Which is a load of bull! The judge did not even listen to those clauses! Disgusting!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Comments are closed.