The biggest reason for regime change in Venezuela has little to do with drugs, freedom-democracy, the Monroe Doctrine or even oil

NOTE: Happy New Year to all my readers and a big thank you to those who donated in 2025. It’s only because of you that I am able to devote myself fulltime to this work, both here and at my Substack.

I learned long ago that the truth will never win you any popularity contests because the media voices with the biggest amplifiers are typically the ones most invested in running cover for government lies.

If you listen to those voices, many of them on Fox News, the January 3 kidnapping of Venezuela’s socialist dictator was a noble effort by a freedom-loving American president who seeks to set the captives free and bless us with cheap oil and endless prosperity. Many alternative media talkers, such as Alex Jones and others with large audiences, have also latched onto this narrative.

They look at these operations in a vacuum as opposed to in the broad scope of history and the track record of previous regime-change operations. That record is long on blood, violence and pillage and short on freedom and democracy.

Those who depend on these influencers for their “news” tend to be folks who live in the moment and the feel-good emotions sparked by video clips they see being passed around on social media. They see liberated Venezuelans dancing in the streets amid overflowing jubilation.

And they drink the Kool Aid.

It tastes so good they want to share it with the rest of us.

In their excitement, some will ask you what you think about Venezuela. Here’s where it gets interesting.

As soon as you begin to share a viewpoint that calls into question their preconceived notion of America as the white-knight savior of the world, it becomes clear they really don’t want to hear what you’ve got to say.

They simply cannot fathom anyone who doesn’t feel the joy. We point them to that stubborn record called history.

Look at Iraq.

Look at Syria.

What about Libya and Afghanistan? Somalia?

Are any of these countries better off as a result of U.S. interventions in their countries?

Their eyes glaze over. They either rebuke you or give you that blank stare. They change the subject. They refuse to consider for a moment that their exuberant feelings might be premature, if not fully misplaced and based on fantasy rather than fact.

No, Venezuela is not about drugs, it’s not about re-establishing the Monroe Doctrine, it’s certainly not about establishing freedom and democracy in Venezuela or any other country.

In fact, it’s not even about oil. Well, it’s partly about oil, but that still doesn’t explain the bigger picture.

It’s about reorienting the world order and catapulting it to the next phase that will ultimately conclude with world government.

Those who’ve allowed their minds to get stuck in the quicksand of the left-right paradigm will never understand what I am about to explain. I could explain it five different ways until I’m blue in the face and they would still only see “communism” at work and Trump as their triumphant anti-communist king riding to the rescue of poor Venezuela.

If he takes all of Latin America, Canada and Greenland, they will be fine with that too. They will defend it with every last ounce of their energy. Because they have bought the false premise that Trump is using the power of the United States military to free the masses and unleash capitalism in a happy-ever-after scenario.

They choose to be deceived rather than to listen and learn from great thinkers and researchers like the late Dr. Antony Sutton and Patrick Wood, whose most recent book The Final Betrayal explains the real story of what’s being done, why and by whom.

The truth is, they need Venezuela and its resources for the North American Technate, which will function as part of their long-awaited New International Economic Order.

Trump may think he’s conquering other nations for America and a more prosperous future, which in itself is not a moral justification for invading and taking what is rightfully the resources of another sovereign country, but it is a distraction that appeals to most conservative Americans who, let’s face it, are desperate for some “wins.” Democrats operate the same way. If their chosen leader tells them something is progress, even if it’s an absurdity like boys can be girls, they will run with it!

“Hey,” the Trumpsters and neocons will say, “look at the Venezuelans celebrating in the streets of Caracas.”

Yes, they celebrated in Iraq too. Remember those statues of Saddam coming down? Remember the parties? The joy? The utter excitement? Freedom had come to Iraq after decades of dictatorship! Ask the people of Iraq today how that worked out for them. Iraq is now dominated by Shiite Muslim militias, and Christians, those few who are left, are fully subjugated.

The Syrians are also getting a taste of what the West’s definition of “freedom” feels like after their dictator, Bashar al-Assad, was overthrown one year ago with the assistance of the CIA. Christians were slaughtered in Iraq after Saddam was overthrown, and Christians are being slaughtered now in Syria. The same happened in Libya after a CIA coup took out that country’s dictator, Muammar Gaddafi.

Now let’s take an honest look inward. If a foreign government had liberated us from Biden in 2022, I bet some of us would have been popping off champagne corks, just as the Democrats would be celebrating now if Trump were overthrown and led out of the White House in chains.

So stop with the nonsense about celebrations as proof of liberation. It’s temporary euphoria at best. Not to mention, many of the videos being passed around online have since been exposed as fake or old footage of unrelated events (one was of Venezuelan soccer fans celebrating a victory some months ago).

In the meantime, Canada, Mexico, Columbia, Greenland, and Iceland, all should be worried. Trump may think he’s conquering these lands for the good of America, but he’s really conquering them for the globalists’ North American Technate.

According to Dr. Dafydd Townley, a professor at the University of Portsmouth:

“A movement that wanted to merge North America into one nation and extend its borders as far as the Panama Canal might sound incredibly familiar. But this group, called the “technocracy movement”, was a group of 1930s nonconformists with big ideas about how to rearrange US society. They proposed a vision that would get rid of waste and make North America highly productive by using technology and science.”

This idea aimed to manage resources more efficiently and eliminate waste through a system based on energy accounting (hence the carbon tax proposed by Elon Musk and other technocrats) instead of monetary exchange.

Dr. Townley continues:

“The Technocrats, sometimes also called Technocracy Inc, proposed merging Canada, Greenland, Mexico, the US and parts of central America into a single continental unit. This they called a ‘Technate.’ It was to be governed by technocratic principles, rather than by national borders and traditional political divisions.”

Wood explains that this concept of a North American Technate failed to gain traction in the 1930s because the population and the state of technology was not ready for it. But the idea would resurface after Zbigniew Brzezinski and David Rockefeller formed the Trilateral Commission in 1973 for the sole purpose of establishing a new international economic order that would allow Rockefeller and other oligarchs to “convert their cash wealth into resource wealth.”

That effort continues to this day. The names and faces may have changed but the plan to dominate the world economically by taking control of its resources and using technology to surveil/control the masses is stronger than ever.

Why do you think Nat Rothschild publicly congratulated Trump on his latest exploits in Venezuela? Because that country and its debt will now be transferred back into the globalist system instead of operating from outside the system on its own nationalistic terms.

Lord Mayor Rothschild once said, “Let us control the money of a country and we care not who makes its laws.”

Gutle Schnaper, the wife of Mayer Amschel Rothschild and mother of five sons, famously said in the 19th century: “If my sons did not want warsthere would be none.”

The Maduro regime chose to deal with China because the U.S. would not respect its nationalistic interests. Maduro was not a good guy, but that has nothing to do with why the U.S. government removed him from power. He was deposed because he was dealing in oil sales to countries we don’t like and doing deals in non-dollar currencies with entities our government-corporate apparatus doesn’t profit from.

They need Venezuela and its vast oil reserves for their Technate. The country of 30 million people also has huge untapped gold mines.

Patrick Wood called it out exactly one year ago, in a January 8, 2025 article titled Is Trump Pursuing Technocracy’s Dream To Create The Great American Technate?

He wrote:

“In one fell swoop, President Trump has just traced out Technocracy’s mystery map of the North American Technate, which stretched from Greenland to just beyond Panama. This far exceeds George W. Bush’s failed attempt to create the North American Union in 2005-2006 to merge the U.S., Mexico, and Canada.”

But they will never come out with the truth of why Venezuela, Canada, Mexico and Greenland all must be conquered. Canada, with a former Bank of England governor and top-tier technocrat, Mark Carney, as its prime minister is already in the bag. So they make up fictional narratives about freedom and democracy in Venezuela and national security for Greenland.

This latest operation was accompanied by a sophisticated disinformation campaign about drugs, oil, and the Monroe Doctrine. Some will even invoke Manifest Destiny. This is nothing more than a North American-tailored, slightly modified version of the Divine Right of Kings.

Don’t be fooled by any of it.

The idea that Trump will flood the global oil market with Venezuelan crude is perhaps the biggest lie being told right now. George W. Bush said the same thing about Iraqi oil that Trump is saying about Venezuelan oil: It will be used to pay for the rebuilding of the country we just took over and there will be more oil wealth to spread around.

But Venezuela’s oil infrastructure will take years to get up to speed. And even when it is fully restored, the oil will not be for U.S. consumption as much as it will serve as an asset to back up the new North American digital currency. That’s what technocracy is: An asset-based economy. The old fiat currency and dollar-based economy is on the way out. We may see dueling digital currencies for a while, with a Chinese digital Yuan and an EU digital Euro vying for supremacy with the North American digital equivalent, perhaps the Stablecoin. But eventually one will win out and the plan will be to further merge the evolving regional Technates into one global beast system.

While you won’t hear anyone talking about it on Fox News or CNN, the real agenda is hiding in plain sight. That’s why Trump refused to negotiate with Maduro, even though Maduro offered Trump everything he said he wanted, including the oil fields. That was only part of what was required.

The bigger picture has to do with a real estate assemblage program for the globalist oligarchs.

Writes Wood: “The technocrat dream of the American Technate is coming alive right before our eyes.”

As an independent journalist specializing in globalism, religion, technocracy and world affairs, Leo Hohmann depends solely his readers for support. He gets no government handouts, corporate ads or sponsorships. If you appreciate these updates and wish to support the site, you may send a donation of any size c/o Leo Hohmann, PO Box 291, Newnan, GA 30264or donate via credit card below. 

Published by

Unknown's avatar

leohohmann

Independent author, researcher, writer.

11 thoughts on “The biggest reason for regime change in Venezuela has little to do with drugs, freedom-democracy, the Monroe Doctrine or even oil”

  1. I usually love your analysis but I don’t think you are correct on this Leo. What if Trump actually is who he claims to be? I think it’s at least possible.

    Like

    1. Who, in your estimation, is he claiming to be? All I’m saying is that this type of threat-based, violent approach to foreign policy by an imperial president unchecked by our feeble Congress will come back to bite us. It will not end well for Trump or America.

      Like

  2. With all this madness, it is a really good time to be born again by God’s Holy Spirit and ready for when that trump of God calls His Bride up to Abba’s house. In the meantime, until that last gentile believer is brought into faith, let’s share the good news and take as many people as possible with us to the eternal presence of our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ. Love You, Lord, and cannot wait to be with you. Maranatha!!!

    Like

    1. Who is Dan, & why are they missing?

      It’s a question that has stumped many for centuries. Why is the tribe of Dan missing from Revelation 7’s “roll call” for the 12 tribes of the Israel of God? To determine this, it is best to look to the old testament to see who Dan was & what they did because history will repeat itself.

      The thing that has been shall be; there’s nothing new under the sun (Ecclesiastes 1:9).

      Old testament Dan rejected their allotment in Israel (Joshua 19:47) & instead physically conquered a large land of plenty (Judges 18:10) inhabited by immigrants (Judges 18:7 & 28) (Zidonian; Jezebel country) known as Laish. Here Dan set up a false religion.

      New testament Dan rejects their allotment in the Israel of God by teaching that the church is separate from Israel. New testament Dan has spiritually & doctrinally conquered a large land of plenty inhabited by immigrants known as America, where the Jezebel (Zidonian) spirit of feminism reigns. Here, Dan has created a false religion known as dispensationalism.

      Genesis 49:17

      King James Version

      17 Dan shall be a serpent by the way, an adder in the path, that biteth the horse heels, so that his rider shall fall backward.

      In 1827, John Nelson Darby fell from a horse & was seriously injured. During this time, he developed his doctrine that divides the church & Israel, thus creating the new testament tribe of Dan by having the church reject it’s allotment in Israel.

      During Darby’s fall, his leg was crushed against a doorpost. Think of the symbolism of that; a false prophet having his leg crushed against a doorpost. Jesus is the Door (John 10:9).

      Baalam had his foot crushed against a wall while riding a donkey in Numbers 22. Darby gained noteriety for his doctrine by giving lectures at Geneva Switzerland; area code 22.

      In Deuteronomy 33:22, we are told that Dan shall leap from Bashan. Darby’s family estate was called Leap Castle.

      In Judges 18’s account of Dan’s conquest of Laish, the words “six hundred” appear 3 times. 600 × 3 = 1800…the birth year of John Nelson Darby.

      Darby & some followers broke away from the Plymouth Brethren & called themselves the “Exclusive Brethren”. In Revelation 7, Dan is the”excluded brethren” who have no inheritance (salvation).

      In Joshua 19:42, Dan inherited Ajalon. Ajalon means “place of deer” or “field of deer”.The name “Darby” (as in John Nelson Darby) means, “deer park” or “deer settlement”.

      Old testament Dan’s conception in Genesis chapter 30 was rooted in impatience for children & an “extra wife” being given to Jacob.

      Children & childbirth are often used as metaphors for end times & the return of Christ (see John 16:21, Matthew 24:8, & 1 Thessalonians 5:3).

      New testament Dan is impatient for “children” (Christ return) so they teach a pre trib rapture & they follow a false christ with an “extra” wife: a pre tribulation gentile bride, & a post rapture, great tribulation jewish bride.

      Dan was firstborn in Genesis 30; Judas betrayed over 30 pieces of silver. Judas was removed from the 12 (disciples). Dan is removed from the 12 (tribes). Judas betrayed over money. The mark is tied to money & Dan will take it when their early escape never comes.

      Dan expects the Lord to return earlier than He has ordained, just like the betraying evil servant in Matthew 24:48-51.

      Dan is not tempering their joy with the reality that tribulation & persecution is coming, just like the offended (Matthew 13:20-21), fallen away (Luke 8:13) betrayers (Matthew 24:10) known as the seeds on the rocks.

      In Revelation 7, Joseph, who is linked to adding & taking away (see Genesis 30:23-24) has his son Manasseh added while Dan is taken away because Dan adds & takes away from Scripture.

      Dan has no inheritance (salvation) in Revelation 7 because their doctrine violates the command given in Revelation 22:19 to not take away from Scripture.

      Violation of this command results in removal from the book of life.

      You cannot teach the doctrine of Dan (dispensationalism) without taking away huge chunks of Revelation from the church & just assigning it to some other group of people.

      You cannot teach the doctrine of Dan without taking away Matthew 24 & Mark 13 from church application & just assigning it to some other group of people.

      Dan misunderstands Paul’s writings & twists the Scriptures to their own destruction (2 Peter 3:15-16).

      Dan also adds a non-existent 2nd resurrection of the righteous to the Text before the tribulation in order to justify their early easy escape heresy.

      Flee the heresies of the new testament Danites before it’s too late.

      Like

  3. I did a “confession” on the previous post, heh, so wont repeat it all here.

    but one of the most revealing things about the Venezuela issue is just how fast all the supposed principled “maga” folk, decrying all the foreign meddling only months before, pivoted to some hoo-rah merkah is back shallow BS. because it was trump. ugh…

    judge napolitano’s show this week has been running back-to-back clips of trump’s about-face on that topic from the campaign to now, and the cynical “this DOES make america great” empty rhetoric.

    biggest “i done toldja” i had to do.. on myself.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. I think economist Martin Armstrong has it right. He says this was a geopolitical move. To keep Russia from building missiles in Venezuela and to hurt China by ending the transfer of oil from Venezuela to China.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Yes, I agree that is part of it along with the longer-range goal of building the Technate. And it will have wider implications that involve the further provocation of Russia and especially China, who we depend on for so many economic necessities.

      Like

      1. We certainly have had a lot of global surprises the last few years so it’s difficult to predict what will happen. Clearly, Russia is still the enemy and I wonder what Putin’s breaking point will be when he has had enough.

        We should have ended our dependence on China before we began. But that too is so difficult to predict with Trump in office.

        Like

  5. You have a happy new year also.
    Hope you’re not getting kick-back for your views on Venezuela.. I just know its about money and oil.
    Ditto Iran when they change regimes there.
    And, maybe Nicaragua.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment