By itself, this comment could be dismissed as mere trolling. But taken in context with other comments about Canada, some believe we should take Trump at his word. Then there’s the Curtis Yarvin factor and the ‘Technate’
I have often wondered if the media persona surrounding Donald Trump as being a “Russian asset,” has been part of a grand deception.
Watching how he has played the Russia-Ukraine peace talks forces me to consider that Trump’s reputation may be part of a plot to deceive Russia and Putin. Let me explain.
Pretend to be on Russia’s side, gain Putin’s trust, and then sell them out at the opportune time. Russia, which could have finished off Ukraine a long time ago, keeps stalling off the inevitable, giving the EU led by Britain and France time to build up their military forces, which have been neglected for decades.
I say this because the core of Europe’s current obsession with Russophobia goes back to London and the royal family. You will not read any more biased coverage of Russia in its war with Ukraine than you will in the British press. Everything is the fault of Putin, whose name they can’t seem to spit out without adding — the “dictator,” the “unprovoked aggressor,” the “despot.”
I think it’s safe to say that British elites, for reasons probably having something to do with history — like the Crimean War in which Britain fought on the side of Ottoman Muslims against Russia from 1854-56 — have a special hatred for Russia.
Russia and Ukraine were set to settle their grievances in April 2022 but it was Britain’s former Prime Minister, Boris Johnson, who was dispatched to Kiev to scuttle the deal and keep the war going by promising endless European/U.S. support.
And yet, we are supposed to believe Trump leans Russian and not British?
Trump proudly displays his coat of arms tracing his lineage back to Scotland, and he has publicly announced his affinity for King Charles and the royal family. In fact, Trump has fancied himself a king in repeated statements going back years, most recently on February 19 of this year. His supporters dismiss this rhetoric as Trump just being Trump and, well, he likes to “troll” people.
Then he let loose last week with the bombshell that he might consider having the U.S. join the British Commonwealth of Nations.
Maybe he is just being a troll, but I think we should know that some very serious people are taking Trump seriously when he talks about making Canada the 51st state and the U.S. joining the British Commonwealth. The two issues are related, says technocracy expert Patrick Wood. To truly understand what’s going on, one must study the connection of global technocracy thought-leader and philosopher Curtis Yarvin and his connection to Trump/Vance billionaire backer Peter Thiel. They envision a regional techno-monarchy that would revive the 1930s’ idea of a “North American Technate,” complete with a parliamentary system and king.
Could this be what’s in the planning stages for our future? I don’t believe it’s possible unless we first go through something historically traumatic, something like World War III.
Wood, who is editor in chief of Technocracy.News, reports that nearly 250 years after America declared independence from Great Britain, President Donald Trump suggested he was open to taking a small step back toward the warm embrace of the British monarchy after a media outlet reported that King Charles III intends to extend an offer for the United States to join the British Commonwealth of Nations.
According to Wood’s piece, King Charles is reportedly preparing to extend the offer of an “associate membership” in the voluntary commonwealth of 56 nations, most of which have history as former British colonies. Trump said he is open to the idea.
Writing on his Truth Social platform while sharing an article referencing the unprecedented offer, Trump said: “I Love King Charles. Sounds good to me!”
First reported by the Daily Mail, the offer from Charles III would be formally extended during the planned state visit by Trump to the U.K.
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer delivered a hand-written invitation from the King to the U.S. leader during a visit to the White House last month.
A member of the Royal Commonwealth Society told the Mail that the possibility of America making entry into the Commonwealth is being discussed at the highest levels as “a wonderful move that would symbolize Britain’s close relationship with the U.S.”
The person added that: “Donald Trump loves Britain and has great respect for the Royal Family, so we believe he would see the benefits of this. Associate membership could, hopefully, be followed by full membership, making the Commonwealth even more important as a global organization.”
He told the Mail that the possibility of America making entry into the Commonwealth represents “a wonderful move that would symbolize Britain’s close relationship with the U.S. …Donald Trump loves Britain and has great respect for the Royal Family, so we believe he would see the benefits of this. Associate membership could, hopefully, be followed by full membership, making the Commonwealth even more important as a global organization.”
Wood, the technocracy expert, made the following astute observation:
“Britain’s PM, Keir Starmer, a member of the Trilateral Commission, hand-delivered the invitation from King Charles to join the Commonwealth. It just so happens that another Trilateral, Mark Carney, is currently PM in Canada. Didn’t we already fight a war (with muskets and bayonets) to get rid of the British jackboot in the first place?”
Then Wood posed the question of whether this represents “a Trilateral pincer from both sides of the Atlantic?”
For those wishing to explore this issue further, Wood had an engaging long-form interview with Brannon Howse that is well worth the time. You can listen to it here.
This site is independent and ad free. I depend solely on my readers for support, no government handouts or corporate sponsorships. If you appreciate these updates and wish to support the site, you may send a donation of any size c/o Leo Hohmann, PO Box 291, Newnan, GA 30264, or donate via credit card below.
LeoHohmann.com 
Google King Charles speech at one of the COP conferences….COP26 I think.
“HE shall have trillions at his disposal”
No clarification on who the HE is that Charles was referring to. There’s also a video on youtube called something like; 26 reasons King Charles is the antichrist. His coat of arms should set off alarm bells. Among the things found on it is 3 ostrich feathers. The ostrich shares many similarities with the mythical creature known as the cockatrice.
Isaiah 14:29
King James Version
29 Rejoice not thou, whole Palestina, because the rod of him that smote thee is broken: for out of the serpent’s root shall come forth a COCKATRICE, and his fruit shall be a fiery flying serpent.
Out of the serpent (Satan) comes forth a cockatrice (king 7/man of sin) & his fruit (death & resurrection》see John 12:24 & 1 Corinthians 15:35-37) shall be a fiery flying serpent (king 8 who is of the 7/false prophet)
Not saying Charles is definitely “the guy” BUT definitely worth keeping an eye on.
LikeLike
Trump’s foreign policy is terrible. He obviously lied about “no more wars” because the US is pushing for war in the Middle East and against Iran. He dithers on Ukraine. His advisors are just as irresponsible, ignorant and warlike as was Biden’s, if not more so. And Trump is easily swayed by whoever talks to him last.
Trump is caught between the British and Israel. The British demand continued war with Russia over Ukraine—so maybe that’s why Trump is waffling over the peace talks with Russia while still sending arms and munitions to Ukraine. That war will go on for years despite Trump’s promise to end it with a phone call. Maybe that’s why the British want us to join their commonwealth as an “associate member” whatever that means in the way of obligations. Britain is still smarting from their loss of Empire and they mean to have it back. Geopolitically, they want Russia balkanized and they want to dominate the Middle East again. They have managed to re-establish their Empire through the financial sector and use it as a weapon. Their tactics of establishing empire has updated itself to the 21st century, but still proceeding forward. They refer to the UK/US relationship as “we supply the brains, they (US) supply the brawn”. A feudal arrangement, IMO.
Meanwhile, a former British proxy–Israel–demands we go to war with Iran and bomb them into the Stone Age. Likely, we will comply totally with their wishes as they control our foreign policy and much of our security services. Trump acted like the footman to that mobster Netanyahu when he came to the US recently—everything but kiss his feet in public submission as some kind of vassal. He was given as a “gift” a golden pager—the kind used as a murder weapon in Lebanon—a gangster kind of gift containing a threat. Trump owes his Zionist donors big time for their contributions to his campaign so the US will continue to supply weapons for the genocide and land grab going on in the Levant. Not to mention all but one member of Congress is bought off by AIPAC. The rest of the world looks upon our Middle East activities with dismay at our total abandonment of morals, principles and common sense, but most of America seems not to notice or care. Our media makes sure we never know the truth, along with many “Christian” denominations cheering on our foreign policy insanity and immorality from the pulpits.
So it’s not going to be “American First” as Trump promised—but the British and Israeli empires first. Are we as taxpayers prepared to be prepared to be further shaken down for more imperial wars that we fight as someone’s proxy??
LikeLiked by 1 person
Interesting OPINION and you know what say about those… I perfer the ones that are more extreme.
LikeLike
“Meanwhile, a former British proxy–Israel–demands we go to war with Iran and bomb them into the Stone Age. Likely, we will comply totally with their wishes as they control our foreign policy and much of our security services.”
It looks like Trump is about to obey:
“In a Sunday interview with NBC, US President Donald Trump expressed his stance on Iran. – If they don’t make a deal, there will be bombing. And it will be bombing the likes of which they have never seen before – said Trump, highlighting the gravity of the situation. His remarks were in response to Iran’s rejection of the proposal for nuclear programme negotiations.”
LikeLike
“Meanwhile, a former British proxy–Israel–demands we go to war with Iran and bomb them into the Stone Age. Likely, we will comply totally with their wishes as they control our foreign policy and much of our security services.”
It looks like Trump is about to obey:
“In a Sunday interview with NBC, US President Donald Trump expressed his stance on Iran. – If they don’t make a deal, there will be bombing. And it will be bombing the likes of which they have never seen before – said Trump, highlighting the gravity of the situation. His remarks were in response to Iran’s rejection of the proposal for nuclear programme negotiations.”
LikeLike
CANADA is a basket case. Youth unemployment and regular unemployment is 7% or higher. I’m a trade, we have 1100 out of work in Toronto.
gas is $1.60 here in Ontario. Mortgages have doubled and rent is sickening. We need Anerica to rid us of these MARXIST BASTARDS.
LikeLike
Appealing to Trumps ego is a smart move by the Beast across the pond. Freedom can only be found in the Kingship of Christ.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Interesting for sure . I hear many Canadians saying it will never happen , we will all know what happened when they said it was unsinkable . The ten heads in revelation are taking shape .
LikeLiked by 2 people
Good observation Frank. There’s definitely something to this, only time will clarify.
LikeLike
trilateral commission and united nations pushed this in early 1970s…mainly for economic reasoning. Really the removal of America’s radical freedoms and Constitutional guarantees.. if Trump is securing America’s return to greatness who is watching him to make sure he is??
LikeLike